English
 
Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
Add to Basket
  Local TagsRelease HistoryDetailsSummary

Released
Journal Article

Reply to “Comment on ‘Validating Intensity Prediction Equations for Italy by Observations’ by Sum Mak, Robert Alan Clements, and Danijel Schorlemmer” by Mathias Raschke

Authors
/persons/resource/smak

Mak,  Sum
2.6 Seismic Hazard and Stress Field, 2.0 Geophysics, Departments, GFZ Publication Database, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum;

/persons/resource/clements

Clements,  Robert
2.1 Physics of Earthquakes and Volcanoes, 2.0 Geophysics, Departments, GFZ Publication Database, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum;

/persons/resource/ds

Schorlemmer,  Danijel
2.6 Seismic Hazard and Stress Field, 2.0 Geophysics, Departments, GFZ Publication Database, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum;

External Ressource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (public)

1724896.pdf
(Publisher version), 341KB

Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Mak, S., Clements, R., Schorlemmer, D. (2016): Reply to “Comment on ‘Validating Intensity Prediction Equations for Italy by Observations’ by Sum Mak, Robert Alan Clements, and Danijel Schorlemmer” by Mathias Raschke. - Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 106, 5, 2414-2415.
https://doi.org/10.1785/0120160200


Cite as: https://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_1724896
Abstract
Raschke (2016) commented on Mak et al. (2015) regarding the use of the performance metric, calculation of the epicentral intensity, and treatment of the focal depths for historical earthquakes when the focal depths have not been estimated in the databases we used. In reply, we present our opinions on these issues. We hope this may help the reader to decide how our study should be interpreted and how future studies of similar kinds should be conducted.