English
 
Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Book Chapter

Two stages of skarn formation in the Hammerlein tinskarn deposit, western Erzgebirge, Germany

Authors
/persons/resource/lefebvre

Lefebvre,  M.
3.1 Inorganic and Isotope Geochemistry, 3.0 Geochemistry, Departments, GFZ Publication Database, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum;

/persons/resource/romer

Romer,  R. L.
3.1 Inorganic and Isotope Geochemistry, 3.0 Geochemistry, Departments, GFZ Publication Database, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum;

/persons/resource/glodnyj

Glodny,  J.
3.1 Inorganic and Isotope Geochemistry, 3.0 Geochemistry, Departments, GFZ Publication Database, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum;

Roscher,  Marco
External Organizations;

External Ressource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in GFZpublic
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Lefebvre, M., Romer, R. L., Glodny, J., Roscher, M. (2017): Two stages of skarn formation in the Hammerlein tinskarn deposit, western Erzgebirge, Germany. - In: Mercier-Langevin, P. (Ed.), Mineral resources to discover: proceedings: 14th SGA biennial meeting August 20-23 2017, Québec City, Canada, Québec : Society for Geology Applied to Mineral Deposits, 1305-1308.


Cite as: https://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_3737893
Abstract
The Hämmerlein Sn-skarn deposit of the western Erzgebirge is hosted in early Palaeozoic schists and gneisses and is closely associated with one of the most voluminous granite intrusions of the Erzgebirge, the Eibenstock granite. The main valuable ore mineral in Hämmerlein is cassiterite which is disseminated in the four types of skarn occurring in the deposit, i.e., garnet, amphibole, pyroxene, and magnetite skarn. There are two scenarios for deposit formation: (1) formation of the skarn during the regional metamorphism at 340 Ma followed by mineralization during granite emplacement at 320 Ma and (2) skarn formation and mineralization directly related to the granite intrusion. Theriak-Domino thermodynamic P-T-XCO2 modelling shows that both scenarios are possible for the formation of the skarn series, but as the Rb-Sr muscovite-based age of skarn samples is 340 Ma, the first scenario is the relevant one. The skarn mineral assemblages formed during regional metamorphism, whereas cassiterite mineralization is related to younger granite emplacement and is associated with chloritization of biotite and precipitation of fluorite. These reactions changed the fluid composition and induced cassiterite mineralization.