English
 
Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Laser and radio tracking for planetary science missions—a comparison

Authors

Dirkx,  Dominic
External Organizations;

Prochazka,  Ivan
External Organizations;

/persons/resource/sbauer

Bauer,  Sven
1.2 Global Geomonitoring and Gravity Field, 1.0 Geodesy, Departments, GFZ Publication Database, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum;

Visser,  Pieter
External Organizations;

Noomen,  Ron
External Organizations;

Gurvits,  Leonid I.
External Organizations;

Vermeersen,  Bert
External Organizations;

External Ressource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (public)

3772912.pdf
(Publisher version), 2MB

Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Dirkx, D., Prochazka, I., Bauer, S., Visser, P., Noomen, R., Gurvits, L. I., Vermeersen, B. (2019): Laser and radio tracking for planetary science missions—a comparison. - Journal of Geodesy, 93, 11, 2405-2420.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-018-1171-x


Cite as: https://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_3772912
Abstract
At present, tracking data for planetary missions largely consists of radio observables: range-rate (Doppler), range and angular position (VLBI/ΔDOR). Future planetary missions may use Interplanetary Laser Ranging (ILR) as a tracking observable. Two-way ILR will provide range data that are about 2 orders of magnitude more accurate than radio-based range data. ILR does not produce Doppler data, however. In this article, we compare the relative strength of radio Doppler and laser range data for the retrieval of parameters of interest in planetary missions, to clarify and quantify the science case of ILR, with a focus on geodetic observables. We first provide an overview of the near-term attainable quality of ILR, in terms of both the realization of the observable and the models used to process the measurements. Subsequently, we analyse the sensitivity of radio Doppler and laser range measurements in representative mission scenarios for parameters of interest. We use both an analytical approximation and numerical analyses of the relative sensitivity of ILR and radio Doppler observables for more general cases. We show that mm-precise range normal points are feasible for ILR, but mm-level accuracy and stability in the full analysis chain are unlikely to be attained, due to a combination of instrumental and model errors. We find that ILR has the potential for superior performance in observing signatures in the data with a characteristic period of greater than 0.33–1.65 hours (assuming 2–10 mm uncertainty for range and 10 μm/s at 60 s for Doppler). This indicates that Doppler tracking will typically remain the method of choice for gravity field determination and spacecraft orbit determination in planetary missions. ILR data will be able to supplement the orbiter tracking data used for the estimation of parameters with a once-per-orbit signal. Laser ranging data, however, are shown to have a significant advantage for the retrieval of rotational and tidal characteristics from landers. Similarly, laser ranging data will be superior for the construction of planetary ephemerides and the improvement of solar system tests of gravitation, both for orbiter and for lander missions.