English
 
Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Kinematics of Subduction Processes during the Earthquake Cycle in Central Chile

Authors

Aguirre,  Leonardo
External Organizations;

Bataille,  Klaus
External Organizations;

Novoa,  Camila
External Organizations;

/persons/resource/carlosp

Pena Hormazabal,  Carlos Raul
2.6 Seismic Hazard and Risk Dynamics, 2.0 Geophysics, Departments, GFZ Publication Database, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum;

/persons/resource/fvera

Vera,  Felipe
2.4 Seismology, 2.0 Geophysics, Departments, GFZ Publication Database, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum;

External Ressource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in GFZpublic
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Aguirre, L., Bataille, K., Novoa, C., Pena Hormazabal, C. R., Vera, F. (2019): Kinematics of Subduction Processes during the Earthquake Cycle in Central Chile. - Seismological Research Letters, 90, 5, 1779-1791.
https://doi.org/10.1785/0220180391


Cite as: https://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_4705900
Abstract
Subduction processes at convergent margins produce complex temporal and spatial crustal displacements during different periods of the earthquake cycle. Satellite geodesy observations provide important clues to constrain kinematic models at subduction zones. Here, we analyze geodetic observations in central Chile, where two large earthquakes occurred: 2010 Mw 8.8 Maule and 2015 Mw 8.3 Illapel. We propose a model that considers the motion along both interfaces of the brittle subducting slab as the sources responsible for themovement of the crust in the different periods of the earthquake cycle.Using standard inversion techniques, we provide a consistent framework of the kinematic displacement during each period of the earthquake cycle.We show that during the interseismic period prior to theMaule and Illapel earthquakes, two patches of slip rate on the lower interface are determined. These patches are located just below the future hypocenters. Because the interseismic period corresponds to the loading process and the coseismic to the unloading process, it is interesting to note that the area where loading is stronger corresponds to the areawhere unloading is also strong. Furthermore,we show that the Maule earthquake causes a significant displacement on the lower interface, just below the epicenter of the future Illapel earthquake to the north, a few years later. We speculate that the interaction betweenmotions along both interfaces is the key to understanding the evolution of stress and the occurrence of earthquakes at subduction zones. This framework improves the understanding of the observed loading and unloading processes and potential triggering between subduction earthquakes.