English
 
Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Rift propagation in rotational versus orthogonal extension: Insights from 4D analogue models

Authors
/persons/resource/zwaan

Zwaan,  Frank
0 Pre-GFZ, Departments, GFZ Publication Database, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum;

Schreurs,  Guido
External Organizations;

/persons/resource/rosen

Rosenau,  M.
4.1 Lithosphere Dynamics, 4.0 Geosystems, Departments, GFZ Publication Database, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum;

External Ressource

https://doi.org/10.5880/FIDGEO.2020.001
(Supplementary material)

Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in GFZpublic
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Zwaan, F., Schreurs, G., Rosenau, M. (2020): Rift propagation in rotational versus orthogonal extension: Insights from 4D analogue models. - Journal of Structural Geology, 135, 103946.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2019.103946


Cite as: https://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_4898911
Abstract
In rift settings, extension rates often vary along strike, due to rotation about a vertical axis or Euler pole, yet tectonic modelers traditionally apply constant along-strike deformation rates. Here we compare rift development and propagation under traditional orthogonal extension versus rotational extension conditions. The set-ups involve brittle-viscous layering and localize deformation through structural weaknesses (seeds). Our models provide first-order insights into the differences in rift development between both boundary conditions: orthogonal extension produces a rift basin with constant synchronous along-strike features, whereas rotational extension induces along-strike structural gradients, diachronous rift development causing rift propagation and the development of V-shaped basins. We observe important viscous flow associated with differential pressure gradients in rotational extension. We also describe the important effects of strain partitioning between rift axis and model boundaries, the quantifying of which is crucial to avoid incorrect model interpretations. Although our model results are first-order only, they are in good agreement with various natural examples and previous modeling studies and highlight the importance of considering the third dimension when studying tectonic systems.