English
 
Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Conference Paper

On the precision of sandbox experiments - insight from test-retest variability

Authors
/persons/resource/tsanti

Santimano,  T.
3.1 Lithosphere Dynamics, 3.0 Geodynamics and Geomaterials, Departments, GFZ Publication Database, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum;

/persons/resource/rosen

Rosenau,  M.
3.1 Lithosphere Dynamics, 3.0 Geodynamics and Geomaterials, Departments, GFZ Publication Database, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum;

Morlock,  M.
External Organizatio;

/persons/resource/oncken

Oncken,  O.
3.1 Lithosphere Dynamics, 3.0 Geodynamics and Geomaterials, Departments, GFZ Publication Database, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum;

External Ressource
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in GFZpublic
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Santimano, T., Rosenau, M., Morlock, M., Oncken, O. (2012): On the precision of sandbox experiments - insight from test-retest variability, (Geophysical Research Abstracts, Vol. 14, EGU2012-7667-2, 2012), General Assembly European Geosciences Union (Vienna, Austria 2012).


Cite as: https://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_826918
Abstract
Analogue models using granular materials are widely used to investigate deformation processes in the Earth’s brittle upper crust. With the advent of high resolution deformation monitoring techniques (e.g. Particle Image Ve- locimetry, PIV), analogue modeling has entered the stage of becoming a potentially quantitative tool. As a classic example, fault and topographical evolution in compressional sand wedges with varying parameters are used to guide our understanding of the kinematics of orogenic belts and collision zones. However, in contrast to numerical models the results of analogue models are subject to intrinsic variability which adds complexity in understanding deformation in a natural setting and limits the transfer of labscale observation to nature. In an attempt to yield quan- titatively reliable results, experimental data should be statistically analyzed rigorously and treated in a probabilistic way in order to control intrinsic variability and produce more valid conclusions. To demonstrate this approach we show results of a series of simple sandbox experiments where one parameter, the basal friction coefficient, is varied systematically from <0.4 to >0.6. With each change in basal friction, experiments were repeated up to 10 times. In particular, the statistics of the following parameters were analyzed: height, length and slope of the wedge and spacing, lifetime and dip of reverse faults within the wedge. Noticeably, differences in basal friction coefficients as little as 0.1, produces statistically significant different results. Specifically, parameters related to faults, e.g. fault dip show high precision with a coefficient of variation (CV) <0.15 and a strong correlation with basal friction. Parameters related to wedge geometry have a higher intrinsic variation (CV <0.4) and weaker correlation with the basal friction. The reasonably good reproducibility of results demonstrated here corroborates that analogue ex- periments are valuable tools to investigate deformation processes in a quantitative way. Nevertheless, experiments need to be repeated several times and data treated with a statistical analysis in order to make sound interpretations.