English
 
Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
 
 
DownloadE-Mail
  The difference in thermospheric response to solar and magnetospheric inputs

Lühr, H., Rentz, S., Ritter, P., Müller, S. (2008): The difference in thermospheric response to solar and magnetospheric inputs, AGU 2010 Fall Meeting (San Francisco, USA 2010).

Item is

Basic

show hide
Item Permalink: https://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_242306 Version Permalink: -
Genre: Conference Paper

Files

show Files

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Lühr, Hermann1, Author              
Rentz, S.2, Author
Ritter, Patricia1, Author              
Müller, S.2, Author
Affiliations:
12.3 Earth's Magnetic Field, 2.0 Physics of the Earth, Departments, GFZ Publication Database, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum, ou_146030              
2External Organizations, ou_persistent22              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: Invited. SA 07: High Latitude Ionosphere-Thermosphere Observations and Modeling During the IPY
 DDC: 550 - Earth sciences
 Abstract: In this talk we present CHAMP accelerometer data interpreted in terms of thermospheric density. In a multi-years statistical study we investigate how the air density in a latitude band of ±30° about the equator on the day and on the night side responds to external forcing. The prime driver of thermospheric density is the solar flux. For magnetically quiet days a high degree of correlation (cc>0.9) is obtained when comparing the mass density with the solar flux index. The slope of the regression line on the day side, however, is steeper by a factor of 2 than on the night side. This ratio is independent of season and solar flux level. Magnetic activity is another driver. In this case the energy input takes place at auroral latitudes. Density bulges created at high latitudes in both hemispheres propagate subsequently towards the equator. On the night side we observe a delayed response compared to the day side, which implies a later energy input in that time sector. Furthermore, we investigate which magnetic activity index is suited best to characterize the air density increase. As an example for magnetospheric input we present the thermospheric response to substorms. The presented results can be used as constraints for the improvement of atmospheric models.

Details

show
hide
Language(s):
 Dates: 2008
 Publication Status: Finally published
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: -
 Identifiers: eDoc: 15879
GFZPOF: PT1 Planet Earth: Global Processes and Change
 Degree: -

Event

show
hide
Title: AGU 2010 Fall Meeting (San Francisco, USA 2010)
Place of Event: -
Start-/End Date: -

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: AGU 2010 Fall Meeting (San Francisco, USA 2010)
Source Genre: Proceedings
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: - Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: - Identifier: -