Deutsch
 
Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT
  Framework for Deterministic Earthquake Ground Motion Maps in Germany using Machine Learning

Steinberg, A., Hobiger, M., Gaebler, P., Vasyura-Bathke, H., Azari Sisi, A. (2023): Framework for Deterministic Earthquake Ground Motion Maps in Germany using Machine Learning, XXVIII General Assembly of the International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics (IUGG) (Berlin 2023).
https://doi.org/10.57757/IUGG23-3261

Item is

Externe Referenzen

einblenden:

Urheber

einblenden:
ausblenden:
 Urheber:
Steinberg, Andreas1, Autor
Hobiger, Manuel1, Autor
Gaebler, Peter1, Autor
Vasyura-Bathke, Hannes1, 2, Autor              
Azari Sisi, Aida1, Autor
Affiliations:
1IUGG 2023, General Assemblies, 1 General, International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics (IUGG), External Organizations, ou_5011304              
22.1 Physics of Earthquakes and Volcanoes, 2.0 Geophysics, Departments, GFZ Publication Database, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum, ou_146029              

Inhalt

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Schlagwörter: -
 Zusammenfassung: The surface effects of an earthquake are typically evaluated using ground motion maps. These ground motion maps are often based on empirical ground motion prediction equations (GMPEs), which however largely neglect source physics and, therefore, the radiation pattern of seismic energy. We present a framework for evaluating seismicity in Germany in which we calculate physics-based deterministic ground motion maps based on forward modeling of full seismic waveforms for different sources; isotropic sources for smaller earthquakes and full seismic moment tensors and finite rectangular sources for larger earthquakes. We use 1-D and 2-D Green’s function databases to rapidly consider a large number of statistically significant scenarios, including variations in Earth structure models, site effects, and source parameters. Basin effects are explicitly modelled. We apply machine learning to generate the ground motion maps even faster and incrementally improve the accuracy of our results with each earthquake based on a comparison between expected and measured peak ground velocity. To evaluate the accuracy of our approach, we compare the ground motion predictions from our waveform simulations to those obtained from regionalized probabilistic ground motion prediction equations (GMPEs) for a variety of synthetic cases. We quantify the differences between the two approaches. We carry out specific tests for an area in southern Germany with induced earthquakes around the two geothermal power plants of Insheim and Landau in the Upper Rhine Graben. We use locally measured passive measured velocity profiles to incorporate site effects in the form of VS30.

Details

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Sprache(n): eng - Englisch
 Datum: 20232023
 Publikationsstatus: Final veröffentlicht
 Seiten: -
 Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: -
 Inhaltsverzeichnis: -
 Art der Begutachtung: -
 Identifikatoren: DOI: 10.57757/IUGG23-3261
 Art des Abschluß: -

Veranstaltung

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Titel: XXVIII General Assembly of the International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics (IUGG)
Veranstaltungsort: Berlin
Start-/Enddatum: 2023-07-11 - 2023-07-20

Entscheidung

einblenden:

Projektinformation

einblenden:

Quelle 1

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Titel: XXVIII General Assembly of the International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics (IUGG)
Genre der Quelle: Konferenzband
 Urheber:
Affiliations:
Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: Potsdam : GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences
Seiten: - Band / Heft: - Artikelnummer: - Start- / Endseite: - Identifikator: -