English
 
Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
 
 
DownloadE-Mail
  Which picker fits my data? A quantitative evaluation of deep learning based seismic pickers

Münchmeyer, J., Woollam, J., Rietbrock, A., Tilmann, F., Lange, D., Bornstein, T., Diehl, T., Giunchi, C., Haslinger, F., Jozinović, D., Michelini, A., Saul, J., Soto, H. (2022 online): Which picker fits my data? A quantitative evaluation of deep learning based seismic pickers. - Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, e2021JB023499.
https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JB023499

Item is

Files

show Files

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Münchmeyer, J.1, Author              
Woollam, Jack2, Author
Rietbrock, Andreas2, Author
Tilmann, Frederik1, Author              
Lange, Dietrich2, Author
Bornstein, Thomas2, Author
Diehl, Tobias2, Author
Giunchi, Carlo2, Author
Haslinger, Florian2, Author
Jozinović, Dario2, Author
Michelini, Alberto2, Author
Saul, Joachim1, Author              
Soto, Hugo3, Author              
Affiliations:
12.4 Seismology, 2.0 Geophysics, Departments, GFZ Publication Database, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum, ou_30023              
2External Organizations, ou_persistent22              
34.1 Lithosphere Dynamics, 4.0 Geosystems, Departments, GFZ Publication Database, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum, ou_146034              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: Deal Wiley
 Abstract: Seismic event detection and phase picking are the base of many seismological workflows. In recent years, several publications demonstrated that deep learning approaches significantly outperform classical approaches, achieving human-like performance under certain circumstances. However, as studies differ in the datasets and evaluation tasks, it is unclear how the different approaches compare to each other. Furthermore, there are no systematic studies about model performance in cross-domain scenarios, i.e., when applied to data with different characteristics. Here, we address these questions by conducting a large-scale benchmark. We compare six previously published deep learning models on eight datasets covering local to teleseismic distances and on three tasks: event detection, phase identification and onset time picking. Furthermore, we compare the results to a classical Baer-Kradolfer picker. Overall, we observe the best performance for EQTransformer, GPD and PhaseNet, with a small advantage for EQTransformer on teleseismic data. Furthermore, we conduct a cross-domain study, analyzing model performance on datasets they were not trained on. We show that trained models can be transferred between regions with only mild performance degradation, but models trained on regional data do not transfer well to teleseismic data. As deep learning for detection and picking is a rapidly evolving field, we ensured extensibility of our benchmark by building our code on standardized frameworks and making it openly accessible. This allows model developers to easily evaluate new models or performance on new datasets. Furthermore, we make all trained models available through the SeisBench framework, giving end-users an easy way to apply these models.

Details

show
hide
Language(s):
 Dates: 2022-01-06
 Publication Status: Published online
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: -
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.1029/2021JB023499
GFZPOF: p4 T3 Restless Earth
OATYPE: Hybrid - DEAL Wiley
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
Source Genre: Journal, SCI, Scopus
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: - Sequence Number: e2021JB023499 Start / End Page: - Identifier: ISSN: 2169-9313
ISSN: 2169-9356
CoNE: https://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/cone/journals/resource/jgr_solid_earth
Publisher: American Geophysical Union (AGU)