English
 
Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  Measuring hydraulic fracture apertures: a comparison of methods

Cheng, C., Hale, S., Milsch, H., Blum, P. (2020): Measuring hydraulic fracture apertures: a comparison of methods. - Solid Earth, 11, 2411-2423.
https://doi.org/10.5194/se-11-2411-2020

Item is

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
5004747.pdf (Publisher version), 8MB
Name:
5004747.pdf
Description:
-
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Cheng, C.1, Author              
Hale, Sina2, Author
Milsch, H.1, Author              
Blum, Philipp2, Author
Affiliations:
14.8 Geoenergy, 4.0 Geosystems, Departments, GFZ Publication Database, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum, ou_146039              
2External Organizations, ou_persistent22              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: Hydraulic fracture apertures predominantly control fluid transport in fractured rock masses. Hence, the objective of the current study is to investigate and compare three different laboratory-scale methods to determine hydraulic apertures in fractured (Fontainebleau and Flechtinger) sandstone samples with negligible matrix permeability. Direct measurements were performed by using a flow-through apparatus and a transient-airflow permeameter. In addition, a microscope camera permitted measuring the mechanical fracture apertures from which the corresponding hydraulic apertures were indirectly derived by applying various empirical correlations. Single fractures in the sample cores were generated artificially either by axial splitting or by a saw cut resulting in hydraulic apertures that ranged between 8 and 66 µm. Hydraulic apertures, accurately determined by the flow-through apparatus, are used to compare results obtained by the other methods. The transient-airflow permeameter delivers accurate values, particularly when repeated measurements along the full fracture width are performed. In this case, the derived mean hydraulic fracture apertures are in excellent quantitative agreement. When hydraulic apertures are calculated indirectly from optically determined mechanical apertures using empirical equations, they show larger variations that are difficult to compare with the flow-through-derived results. Variations in hydraulic apertures as observed between methods are almost certainly related to differences in sampled fracture volume. Overall, using direct flow-through measurements as a reference, this study demonstrates the applicability of portable methods to determine hydraulic fracture apertures at both the laboratory and outcrop scales.

Details

show
hide
Language(s):
 Dates: 2020-12-112020
 Publication Status: Finally published
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: -
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.5194/se-11-2411-2020
GFZPOF: p3 PT7 Ene
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Solid Earth
Source Genre: Journal, SCI, Scopus, oa
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 11 Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 2411 - 2423 Identifier: CoNE: https://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/cone/journals/resource/journals454
Publisher: Copernicus