English
 
Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  Boron isotope variations in tourmaline from hydrothermal ore deposits: controlling factors and insights for mineralizing systems

Trumbull, R., Codeço, M. S., Jiang, S.-Y., Palmer, M. R., Slack, J. f. (2021): Boron isotope variations in tourmaline from hydrothermal ore deposits: controlling factors and insights for mineralizing systems - Goldschmidt - Abstracts, Goldschmidt Virtual 2021 (Online 2021).

Item is

Files

show Files

Locators

show
hide
Description:
Link zum Abstract (Goldschmidt Virtual 2021)

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Trumbull, R.1, Author              
Codeço, Marta S.1, Author              
Jiang, S.-Y., Author
Palmer, M. R., Author
Slack, J. f., Author
Affiliations:
13.1 Inorganic and Isotope Geochemistry, 3.0 Geochemistry, Departments, GFZ Publication Database, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum, ou_146040              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: Boron is a fluid-mobile element whose isotopic composition reflects many factors that are relevant to understanding mineralizing processes, including fluid source(s), fluid-rock interaction, and mineralization temperature. The most important host of boron in hydrothermal mineral deposits is tourmaline, which is fortuitous because this is a very stable and chemically resistant mineral with a wide compositional range. We have compiled published B-isotope data of tourmaline from 110 hydrothermal deposits worldwide (>2210 analyses) organized into seven groups: porphyry Cu-Mo-Au deposits, granite-related Sn-W deposits, IOCG deposits, orogenic Au deposits, stratabound VMS and SEDEX deposits, and sediment-hosted U deposits (Mendeley Data, V4, doi: 10.17632/tv5y7xt9fb.4). The total range of δ11B values for all deposits is -26.8 to +35.0 ‰. Four deposit types (granite Sn-W, orogenic Au, stratabound VMS and SEDEX) have median δ11B values close to the continental crustal average of ca. -10 ‰, whereas the median values for IOCG and porphyry Cu-Mo-Au deposits are higher (-3.9 ‰ and -2.1 ‰, respectively); the median for sediment-hosted U deposits is distinctly higher (+25.3 ‰). Importantly, each deposit type displays a considerable range of δ11B values, the smallest being 18 ‰ for granite Sn-W deposits and the largest (48 ‰) for IOCG deposits. These boron isotope ranges are suggested to reflect three levels of controlling factors. The primary one is the composition of the boron source; secondary effects relate to fluid-tourmaline fractionation (equilibrium or Rayleigh). There are commonly also tertiary factors that depend on evolution of the specific deposit, which include fluid mixing, changing water-rock ratio and/or depositional temperature, influences of other boron-bearing minerals, and where relevant, post-ore metamorphism. Separating the effects of these factors is rarely possible from boron isotopes alone, as selected case studies illustrate. However, multi-isotope studies of tourmaline, and approaches that combine isotopic and chemical variations in tourmaline can potentially overcome this limitation.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 202120212021
 Publication Status: Finally published
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: -
 Identifiers: GFZPOF: p4 T8 Georesources
 Degree: -

Event

show
hide
Title: Goldschmidt Virtual 2021
Place of Event: Online
Start-/End Date: 2021-07-04 - 2021-07-09

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Goldschmidt - Abstracts
Source Genre: Proceedings
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: - Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: - Identifier: -