English
 
Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
Add to Basket
 Local TagsRelease HistoryDetailsSummary
  The Representation of slope- and ridge-Scale wind and snowfall patterns in models of different complexity

Mott, R., Kruyt, B., Fiddes, J., Gerber, F., Reynolds, D., Sharma, V. (2023): The Representation of slope- and ridge-Scale wind and snowfall patterns in models of different complexity, XXVIII General Assembly of the International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics (IUGG) (Berlin 2023).
https://doi.org/10.57757/IUGG23-4195

Item is

 

show all hide all

Basic

show hide
Item Permalink: https://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_5021634 Version Permalink: https://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_5021634_1
Genre: Conference Paper

Files

show Files

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Mott, Rebecca1, Author
Kruyt, Bert1, Author
Fiddes, Joel1, Author
Gerber, Franziska1, Author
Reynolds, Dylan1, Author
Sharma, Varun1, Author
Affiliations:
1IUGG 2023, General Assemblies, 1 General, International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics (IUGG), External Organizations, ou_5011304              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: We compare three models of different complexity in their ability to downscale and represent wind and snow fall patterns at the ridge- and slope scale. We present a comparison of three downscaling methods of varying complexity, that are used to downscale data from the Numerical Weather Prediction model COSMO-1 at 1.1 km horizontal resolution to 250 and 50 m in highly complex terrain. We compare WRF, a dynamical atmospheric model; ICAR, a model of intermediate complexity; and TopoSCALE, an efficient topography-based downscaling scheme. While point-scale validation at meteorological stations shows similar results for all three models, the spatial patterns vary significantly. Spatial snow deposition patterns are validated against LIDAR data and indicate that WRF is able to capture preferential deposition of snow, while ICAR shows a weak signal. Qualitative comparison of 3D ridge-flow interactions shows reasonable agreement between ICAR and WRF at 250 m resolution, yet at 50 m resolution WRF simulates complex flow patterns that ICAR cannot reproduce. Based on these findings and the significant reduction in computational costs, ICAR is a cost-efficient alternative to WRF at the 250 m resolution but is not able to capture complex ridge-scale flow patterns. TopoScale performs very well in point-scale comparisons, but it is unclear if this can be attributed to the model itself or to the forcing data and the observations assimilated therein. These finding motivated the recent development of a new model variant of the ICAR model (HICAR) which further improved the model performance at high resolutions and complex terrain.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2023-07-112023-07-11
 Publication Status: Finally published
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: -
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.57757/IUGG23-4195
 Degree: -

Event

show
hide
Title: XXVIII General Assembly of the International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics (IUGG)
Place of Event: Berlin
Start-/End Date: 2023-07-11 - 2023-07-20

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: XXVIII General Assembly of the International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics (IUGG)
Source Genre: Proceedings
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: Potsdam : GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences
Pages: - Volume / Issue: - Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: - Identifier: -