English
 
Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
 
 
DownloadE-Mail
  Simulating Long‐Term Dynamics of Radiation Belt Electrons Using DREAM3D Model

Lee, S., Tu, W., Cunningham, G. S., Cowee, M. M., Wang, D., SHPRITS, Y., Henderson, M. G., Reeves, G. D. (2024): Simulating Long‐Term Dynamics of Radiation Belt Electrons Using DREAM3D Model. - Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 129, 2, e2023JA032286.
https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JA032286

Item is

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
5025471.pdf (Publisher version), 4MB
 
File Permalink:
-
Name:
5025471.pdf
Description:
-
Visibility:
Private (embargoed till 2024-08-11)
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-
License:
-

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Lee, Sang‐Yun1, Author
Tu, Weichao1, Author
Cunningham, Gregory S.1, Author
Cowee, Misa M.1, Author
Wang, D.2, Author              
SHPRITS, YURI2, Author              
Henderson, Michael G.1, Author
Reeves, Geoffrey D.1, Author
Affiliations:
1External Organizations, ou_persistent22              
22.7 Space Physics and Space Weather, 2.0 Geophysics, Departments, GFZ Publication Database, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum, ou_2239888              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: We compared the performance of DREAM3D simulations in reproducing the long‐term radiation belt dynamics observed by Van Allen Probes over the entire year of 2017 with various boundary conditions (BCs) and model inputs. Specifically, we investigated the effects of three different outer boundary conditions, two different low‐energy boundary conditions for seed electrons, four different radial diffusion (RD) coefficients (DLL), four hiss wave models, and two chorus wave models from the literature. Using the outer boundary condition driven by GOES data, our benchmark simulation generally well reproduces the observed radiation belt dynamics inside L* = 6, with a better model performance at lower μ than higher μ, where μ is the first adiabatic invariant. By varying the boundary conditions and inputs, we find that: (a) The data‐driven outer boundary condition is critical to the model performance, while adding in the data‐driven seed population doesn't further improve the performance. (b) The model shows comparable performance with DLL from Brautigam and Albert (2000, https://doi.org/10.1029/1999ja900344), Ozeke et al. (2014, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013ja019204), and Liu et al. (2016, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015gl067398), while with DLL from Ali et al. (2016, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016ja023002) the model shows less RD compared to data. (c) The model performance is similar with data‐based hiss models, but the results show faster loss is still needed inside the plasmasphere. (d) The model performs similarly with the two different chorus models, but better capturing the electron enhancement at higher μ using the Wang et al. (2019, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018ja026183) model due to its stronger wave power, since local heating for higher energy electrons is under‐reproduced in the current model.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2024-02-112024
 Publication Status: Finally published
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: -
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.1029/2023JA032286
GFZPOF: p4 T1 Atmosphere
GFZPOFWEITERE: p4 T3 Restless Earth
OATYPE: Green Open Access
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics
Source Genre: Journal, SCI, Scopus
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 129 (2) Sequence Number: e2023JA032286 Start / End Page: - Identifier: ISSN: 2169-9380
ISSN: 2169-9402
CoNE: https://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/cone/journals/resource/jgr_space_physics
Publisher: American Geophysical Union (AGU)
Publisher: Wiley