English
 
Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
 
 
DownloadE-Mail
  CHONK 1.0: landscape evolution framework: cellular automata meets graph theory.

Gailleton, B., Malatesta, L. C., Cordonnier, G., Braun, J. (2024): CHONK 1.0: landscape evolution framework: cellular automata meets graph theory. - Geoscientific Model Development, 17, 1, 71-90.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-71-2024

Item is

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
5025916.pdf (Publisher version), 4MB
Name:
5025916.pdf
Description:
-
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Gailleton, Boris1, Author              
Malatesta, Luca C.2, Author              
Cordonnier, Guillaume2, Author              
Braun, Jean2, Author              
Affiliations:
14.7 Earth Surface Process Modelling, 4.0 Geosystems, Departments, GFZ Publication Database, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum, ou_1729888              
20 Pre-GFZ, Departments, GFZ Publication Database, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum, ou_146023              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: Landscape evolution models (LEMs) are prime tools for simulating the evolution of source-to-sink systems through ranges of spatial and temporal scales. A plethora of various empirical laws have been successfully applied to describe the different parts of these systems: fluvial erosion, sediment transport and deposition, hillslope diffusion, or hydrology. Numerical frameworks exist to facilitate the combination of different subsets of laws, mostly by superposing grids of fluxes calculated independently. However, the exercise becomes increasingly challenging when the different laws are inter-connected: for example when a lake breaks the upstream–downstream continuum in the amount of sediment and water it receives and transmits; or when erosional efficiency depends on the lithological composition of the sediment flux. In this contribution, we present a method mixing the advantages of cellular automata and graph theory to address such cases. We demonstrate how the former ensure interoperability of the different fluxes (e.g. water, fluvial sediments, hillslope sediments) independently of the process law implemented in the model, while the latter offers a wide range of tools to process numerical landscapes, including landscapes with closed basins. We provide three scenarios largely benefiting from our method: (i) one where lake systems are primary controls on landscape evolution, (ii) one where sediment provenance is closely monitored through the stratigraphy and (iii) one where heterogeneous provenance influences fluvial incision dynamically. We finally outline the way forward to make this method more generic and flexible.

Details

show
hide
Language(s):
 Dates: 2024-01-052024
 Publication Status: Finally published
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: Peer
 Identifiers: GFZPOF: p4 T5 Future Landscapes
DOI: 10.5194/gmd-17-71-2024
OATYPE: Gold Open Access
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Geoscientific Model Development
Source Genre: Journal, SCI, Scopus, oa
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 17 (1) Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 71 - 90 Identifier: ISSN: 1991-959X
ISSN: 1991-9603
CoNE: https://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/cone/journals/resource/journals185
Publisher: Copernicus