English
 
Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  Resolving a ramp-flat structure from combined analysis of co- and post-seismic geodetic data: an example of the 2015 Pishan Mw 6.5 earthquake

Zhao, X., Wen, Y., Xu, C., He, K., Dahm, T. (2024): Resolving a ramp-flat structure from combined analysis of co- and post-seismic geodetic data: an example of the 2015 Pishan Mw 6.5 earthquake. - Geophysical Journal International, 237, 2, 741-754.
https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggae072

Item is

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
5026474.pdf (Publisher version), 3MB
Name:
5026474.pdf
Description:
-
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Zhao, Xiong1, Author              
Wen, Y.2, Author
Xu, C.2, Author
He, K.2, Author
Dahm, T.1, Author              
Affiliations:
12.1 Physics of Earthquakes and Volcanoes, 2.0 Geophysics, Departments, GFZ Publication Database, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum, ou_146029              
2External Organizations, ou_persistent22              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: Previous studies have shown that it is difficult to determine whether the 2015 Pishan earthquake occurred on a uniform fault or a ramp-flat fault with variable dip angles due to the similar goodness of data fit to coseismic and afterslip models on these two fault models. Here, we first present the InSAR deformation obtained from both ascending and descending orbits, covering the coseismic period and cumulative 5-yr period after the 2015 Pishan earthquake. We then determine the preferred fault geometry by the spatial distributions between the positive Coulomb failure stress change triggered by main shock and the afterslip. Based on the preferred fault model, we finally use a combined model to determine the contributions of elastic and viscoelastic deformation in the post-seismic deformation. We find that the Pishan earthquake prefers to occur on a ramp-flat fault, and the coseismic slip is mainly distributed at a depth of 9–13 km, with a maximum slip of about 1.3 m. The post-seismic deformation is primarily governed by afterslip, as the poroelastic rebound-induced deformation fails to account for the observed post-seismic deformation and the contributions from the viscoelastic relaxation mechanism can be considered negligible in the combined model. Moreover, the modelled stress-driven afterslip and observed kinematic afterslip have good consistency, and the difference between the root mean square error of the two afterslip models is only 4.3 mm. The results from the afterslip model indicate that both of the updip and downdip directions distribute the afterslip, and slip in the updip direction is greater than that of the downdip direction. Meanwhile, the maximum cumulative afterslip after 5 yr is approximately 0.26 m which is equivalent to a released seismic moment of a Mw 6.47.

Details

show
hide
Language(s):
 Dates: 20242024
 Publication Status: Finally published
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: -
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggae072
GFZPOF: p3 PT4 Natural Hazards
OATYPE: Gold Open Access
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Geophysical Journal International
Source Genre: Journal, SCI, Scopus, ab 2024 OA-Gold
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 237 (2) Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 741 - 754 Identifier: ISSN: 0956-540X
ISSN: 1365-246X
CoNE: https://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/cone/journals/resource/journals180
Publisher: Oxford University Press