English
 
Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Correlation based snapshot models of the archeomagnetic field

Authors
/persons/resource/mauerber

Mauerberger,  Stefan
0 Pre-GFZ, Departments, GFZ Publication Database, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum;

/persons/resource/arthus

Schanner,  Maximilian Arthus
2.3 Geomagnetism, 2.0 Geophysics, Departments, GFZ Publication Database, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum;

/persons/resource/monika

Korte,  M.
2.3 Geomagnetism, 2.0 Geophysics, Departments, GFZ Publication Database, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum;

Holschneider,  M.
External Organizations;

External Ressource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (public)

5003055.pdf
(Publisher version), 4MB

Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Mauerberger, S., Schanner, M. A., Korte, M., Holschneider, M. (2020): Correlation based snapshot models of the archeomagnetic field. - Geophysical Journal International, 223, 1, 648-665.
https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggaa336


Cite as: https://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_5003055
Abstract
For the time stationary global geomagnetic field, a new modelling concept is presented. A Bayesian non-parametric approach provides realistic location dependent uncertainty estimates. Modelling related variabilities are dealt with systematically by making little subjective a priori assumptions. Rather than parametrizing the model by Gauss coefficients, a functional analytic approach is applied. The geomagnetic potential is assumed a Gaussian process to describe a distribution over functions. A priori correlations are given by an explicit kernel function with non-informative dipole contribution. A refined modelling strategy is proposed that accommodates non-linearities of archeomagnetic observables: First, a rough field estimate is obtained considering only sites that provide full field vector records. Subsequently, this estimate supports the linearization that incorporates the remaining incomplete records. The comparison of results for the archeomagnetic field over the past 1000 yr is in general agreement with previous models while improved model uncertainty estimates are provided.