English
 
Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Correlation based time evolution of the archeomagnetic field

Authors
/persons/resource/arthus

Schanner,  Maximilian Arthus
2.3 Geomagnetism, 2.0 Geophysics, Departments, GFZ Publication Database, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum;

/persons/resource/mauerber

Mauerberger,  Stefan
0 Pre-GFZ, Departments, GFZ Publication Database, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum;

/persons/resource/monika

Korte,  M.
2.3 Geomagnetism, 2.0 Geophysics, Departments, GFZ Publication Database, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum;

Holschneider,  M.
External Organizations;

External Ressource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (public)

5007183.pdf
(Publisher version), 3MB

Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Schanner, M. A., Mauerberger, S., Korte, M., Holschneider, M. (2021): Correlation based time evolution of the archeomagnetic field. - Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 126, 7, e2020JB021548.
https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JB021548


Cite as: https://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_5007183
Abstract
In a previous study, a new snapshot modeling concept for the archeomagnetic field was introduced (Mauerberger et al., 2020). By assuming a Gaussian process for the geomagnetic potential, a correlation based algorithm was presented, which incorporates a closed form spatial correlation function. This work extends the suggested modeling strategy to the temporal domain. A space-time correlation kernel is constructed from the tensor product of the closed form spatial correlation kernel with a squared exponential kernel in time. Dating uncertainties are incorporated into the modeling concept using a noisy input Gaussian process. All but one modeling hyperparameters are marginalized, to reduce their influence on the outcome and to translate their variability to the posterior variance. The resulting distribution incorporates uncertainties related to dating, measurement and modeling process. Results from application to archeomagnetic data show less variation in the dipole than comparable models, but are in general agreement with previous findings.