English
 
Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Geothermal Heat Flow and Thermal Structure of the Antarctic Lithosphere

Authors
/persons/resource/carina

Haeger,  Carina
1.3 Earth System Modelling, 1.0 Geodesy, Departments, GFZ Publication Database, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum;

/persons/resource/alexei

Petrunin,  A. G.
1.3 Earth System Modelling, 1.0 Geodesy, Departments, GFZ Publication Database, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum;

/persons/resource/kaban

Kaban,  M. K.
1.3 Earth System Modelling, 1.0 Geodesy, Departments, GFZ Publication Database, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum;

External Ressource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (public)

5011234.pdf
(Publisher version), 4MB

Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Haeger, C., Petrunin, A. G., Kaban, M. K. (2022): Geothermal Heat Flow and Thermal Structure of the Antarctic Lithosphere. - Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems (G3), 23, 10, e2022GC010501.
https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GC010501


Cite as: https://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_5011234
Abstract
High-quality maps of Geothermal heat flow (GHF) are crucial when modeling ice dynamics, shape, and mass loss of the Antarctic Ice Sheet, which is one of the largest potential contributors to sea level rise. The determination of GHF remains challenging, as in situ data are sparse and geophysical models exhibit large discrepancies in amplitude and resolution, especially on regional scales. Using a novel approach implementing a joint inversion of gravity and seismic tomography data with various geophysical and mineral physics information, we estimate the 3D thermal lithospheric structure and present a new GHF map. The resulting surface heat flow correlates with the location of subglacial volcanism and can represent a boundary condition for accurate ice dynamics models that can explain observed acceleration in the ongoing ice mass loss. Absolute values are within the range of other seismology-based methods and are much lower than those obtained using for example, magnetic data. High uncertainties remain in the parametrization of the upper crustal structure and thermal parameters.