Item

Abstract

Ground-motion models (GMMs) are often used to predict the random distribution of Spectral accelerations ( SAs ) at a site due to a nearby earthquake. In probabilistic seismic hazard and risk assessment, large earthquakes occurring close to a site are considered as critical scenarios. GMMs are expected to predict realistic SAs with low within-model uncertainty ( σμ ) for such rare scenarios. However, the datasets used to regress GMMs are usually deficient of data from critical scenarios. The (Kotha et al., A Regionally Adaptable Ground- Motion Model for Shallow Crustal Earthquakes in Europe Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 18:4091–4125, 2020) GMM developed from the Engineering strong motion (ESM) dataset was found to predict decreasing short-period SAs with increasing M W ≥ Mh = 6.2 , and with large σμ at near-source distances ≤ 30km . In this study, we updated the parametrisation of the GMM based on analyses of ESM and the Near source strong motion (NESS) datasets. With Mh = 5.7 , we could rectify the M W scaling issue, while also reducing σμ at M W ≥ Mh . We then evaluated the GMM against NESS data, and found that the SAs from a few large, thrust-faulting events in California, New Zealand, Japan, and Mexico are significantly higher than GMM median predictions. However, recordings from these events were mostly made on soft-soil geology, and contain anisotropic pulse-like effects. A more thorough non-ergodic treatment of NESS was not possible because most sites sampled unique events in very diverse tectonic environments. We provide an updated set of GMM coefficients, σμ , and heteroscedastic variance models; while also cautioning against its application for M W ≤ 4 in low-moderate seismicity regions without evaluating the homogeneity of M W estimates between pan-European ESM and regional datasets.