English
 
Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Conference Paper

A Bayesian decision approach for issuing flood warnings

Authors

Biondi,  daniela
IUGG 2023, General Assemblies, 1 General, International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics (IUGG), External Organizations;

Greco,  Aldo
IUGG 2023, General Assemblies, 1 General, International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics (IUGG), External Organizations;

Todini,  Ezio
IUGG 2023, General Assemblies, 1 General, International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics (IUGG), External Organizations;

Pasquale,  Versace
IUGG 2023, General Assemblies, 1 General, International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics (IUGG), External Organizations;

External Ressource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in GFZpublic
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Biondi, d., Greco, A., Todini, E., Pasquale, V. (2023): A Bayesian decision approach for issuing flood warnings, XXVIII General Assembly of the International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics (IUGG) (Berlin 2023).
https://doi.org/10.57757/IUGG23-3294


Cite as: https://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_5019694
Abstract
The aim of this work to illustrate a framework for flood early warning systems based on Bayesian forecast-decision theory. Bayesian decision approach provides a framework for issuing warnings under uncertainty and requires the definition of a predictive probability density of the future state and of a utility function that quantifies, often in economic terms, the consequences of the various actions to be taken. The rational choice is the one that minimize the expected value of losses. The approach is illustrated using one-day ahead warnings relying on severe precipitation forecasts issued by the Italian Civil Protection Department over a Weather Vigilance Zone of the national warning system in Italy. For this purpose, starting from Quantitative Precipitation Forecasts (QPFs), a post-processing technique to evaluate future rainfall conditional predictive distributions, namely the Univariate version of the Model conditional Processor (UMCP), was adopted. The obtained probabilistic predictive distribution is then used within a Bayesian decision scheme with different utility functions describing subjectively evaluated costs under the decision whether or not to issue a warning. Results show that post-processed forecasts provide better performance in terms of accuracy and reliability than ensemble QPFs, tend to correct bias and are generally less under-dispersive than raw forecasts for the investigated area. The system performances assuming a Bayesian utility function minimization criterion are then compared with the traditional approach for issuing warnings based on deterministic thresholds, demonstrating improvements in the identification of critical events and a sensible gain in terms of total cost from warnings.