Antarctic circumpolar current strength in the FOCI climate model: 
Parameterizing vs. explicitly simulating mesoscale eddies

Martin, Torge; Kjellsson, Joakim; Deutloff, Jakob; Noack, Julia; Ödalen, Malin; Wahl, Sebastian; Zeller, Mathias

doi:10.57757/IUGG23-3802

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Add to Basket

Local TagsRelease HistoryDetailsSummary

Released

Conference Paper

Antarctic circumpolar current strength in the FOCI climate model: Parameterizing vs. explicitly simulating mesoscale eddies

Authors

Martin, Torge
IUGG 2023, General Assemblies, 1 General, International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics (IUGG), External Organizations;

Kjellsson, Joakim
IUGG 2023, General Assemblies, 1 General, International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics (IUGG), External Organizations;

Deutloff, Jakob
IUGG 2023, General Assemblies, 1 General, International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics (IUGG), External Organizations;

Noack, Julia
IUGG 2023, General Assemblies, 1 General, International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics (IUGG), External Organizations;

Ödalen, Malin
IUGG 2023, General Assemblies, 1 General, International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics (IUGG), External Organizations;

Wahl, Sebastian
IUGG 2023, General Assemblies, 1 General, International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics (IUGG), External Organizations;

Zeller, Mathias
IUGG 2023, General Assemblies, 1 General, International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics (IUGG), External Organizations;

External Ressource

No external resources are shared

Fulltext (public)

There are no public fulltexts stored in GFZpublic

Supplementary Material (public)

There is no public supplementary material available

Citation

Martin, T., Kjellsson, J., Deutloff, J., Noack, J., Ödalen, M., Wahl, S., Zeller, M. (2023): Antarctic circumpolar current strength in the FOCI climate model: Parameterizing vs. explicitly simulating mesoscale eddies, XXVIII General Assembly of the International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics (IUGG) (Berlin 2023).
https://doi.org/10.57757/IUGG23-3802

Cite as: https://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_5020743

Abstract

The Antarctic Circumpolar Current (ACC) is shaped by westerly winds, a meridional density gradient, topography and mesoscale activity. Ekman-driven isopycnal sloping is counterbalanced by eddy mixing. Many global climate models deal with a Southern Ocean (SO) warm bias and bottom water formation issues. Eddy processes are often parameterized in absence of sufficient resolution. Increasingly frequent, ocean grids at 1/4˚–1/12˚ are applied allowing for some representation of the mesoscale and eddy parameterization is thus turned off. We use FOCI, a global climate model based on ECHAM and NEMO atmosphere and ocean models with the capability of two-way nesting in the ocean to discuss related effects. Grid refinement south of 28˚S from 1/2˚ to 1/10˚ enables a realistic representation of mesoscale dynamics in the latitude band of the ACC, whereas standard GM-parameterization is applied to the non-eddying model. In both model configurations the deep, dense water layer is eroding over the first 50 years of the simulation after starting from observation-based initial fields. ACC strength declines from initially 165 Sv to 110–120 Sv. In the nested, eddying simulation the dense water layer recovers until model year 100 and ACC strength resumes to about 150 Sv. In contrast, ACC strength keeps declining in the eddy-parameterized run, which also starts to form a significant SO warm bias (see contribution presented by M. Ödalen in this session). We shed light on the mechanisms leading to the recovery of the ACC on multi-decadal timescale and the role of mesoscale dynamics therein.