Deutsch
 
Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT
Zur Ablage hinzufügen
  Lokale TagsFreigabegeschichteDetailsÜbersicht

Freigegeben
Konferenzbeitrag

To late to cool? – Potential irreversible climate impacts in an “SAI emergency brake” scenario

Urheber*innen

Wieners,  Claudia
IUGG 2023, General Assemblies, 1 General, International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics (IUGG), External Organizations;

Pflüger,  Daniel
IUGG 2023, General Assemblies, 1 General, International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics (IUGG), External Organizations;

de Jong,  Jasper
IUGG 2023, General Assemblies, 1 General, International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics (IUGG), External Organizations;

Baatsen,  Michiel
IUGG 2023, General Assemblies, 1 General, International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics (IUGG), External Organizations;

Román de Miguel,  Fiona
IUGG 2023, General Assemblies, 1 General, International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics (IUGG), External Organizations;

Dijkstra,  Henk
IUGG 2023, General Assemblies, 1 General, International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics (IUGG), External Organizations;

Externe Ressourcen
Es sind keine externen Ressourcen hinterlegt
Volltexte (frei zugänglich)
Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Volltexte in GFZpublic verfügbar
Ergänzendes Material (frei zugänglich)
Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Ergänzenden Materialien verfügbar
Zitation

Wieners, C., Pflüger, D., de Jong, J., Baatsen, M., Román de Miguel, F., Dijkstra, H. (2023): To late to cool? – Potential irreversible climate impacts in an “SAI emergency brake” scenario, XXVIII General Assembly of the International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics (IUGG) (Berlin 2023).
https://doi.org/10.57757/IUGG23-3694


Zitierlink: https://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_5020848
Zusammenfassung
Many Solar Radiation Management model experiments simulate ordered, early-onset scenarios. We investigate the undesirable scenario in which SRM is first rejected, and then implemented in a rush (``emergency brake’’). To this end, we perform a simulation in which Stratospheric Aerosol Injection (SAI) is implemented in 2080 against a background SSP5-85 scenario. The outcome is compared to a simulation where SAI starts in 2020. In both cases, SAI intensity is chosen such as to achieve a target temperature, 1.5 degrees above pre-industrial, by means of a feedback control loop.This feedback method has originally been developed for the Geoengineering Large Ensemble (GLENS; Tilmes et al., 2018) simulations and follow-ups, which used the CESM-WACCM model (i.e. including full stratospheric chemistry). We adapted the technique to work with the computationally much cheaper CESM2-CAM model (without stratospheric chemistry). The early-onset simulation stabilizes global mean surface temperature target, and the emergency brake simulation reaches the target a few years after onset. However, other climate outcomes differ. In particular, the North Atlantic Overturning Circulation (AMOC) weakens strongly before SAI onset in the emergency brake simulation and is not restored to the (also somewhat weakened) state reached in the early-onset simulation. The combination of a weakened AMOC and sudden SAI lead to a cooling below pre-industrial values in the North Atlantic region. Our results cast doubt on the viability of SAI as an emergency brake to be used “only in case we need it”: That approach might lead to persistent long-term or even irreversible climate change.