Leaf Area Index and Surface Albedo Estimation: Comparative Analysis from 
Vegetation Indexes to Radiative Transfer Models

Berger [Richter], Katja; Vuolo, F.; D'Urso, G.

doi:10.1109/IGARSS.2008.4779453

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Add to Basket

Local TagsRelease HistoryDetailsSummary

Released

Conference Paper

Leaf Area Index and Surface Albedo Estimation: Comparative Analysis from Vegetation Indexes to Radiative Transfer Models

Authors

/persons/resource/kberger

Berger [Richter], Katja
0 Pre-GFZ, Departments, GFZ Publication Database, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum;

Vuolo, F.
External Organizations;

D'Urso, G.
External Organizations;

External Ressource

No external resources are shared

Fulltext (public)

There are no public fulltexts stored in GFZpublic

Supplementary Material (public)

There is no public supplementary material available

Citation

Berger [Richter], K., Vuolo, F., D'Urso, G. (2008): Leaf Area Index and Surface Albedo Estimation: Comparative Analysis from Vegetation Indexes to Radiative Transfer Models, IGARSS 2008 - 2008 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (Boston, MA, USA 2008), III - 736-III - 739.
https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.2008.4779453

Cite as: https://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_5027993

Abstract

Leaf Area Index (LAI) and surface albedo (r) of maize, alfalfa, vineyard and chicory were estimated and validated with ground data acquired during the PLEIADeS field campaign in Sardinia, Italy, 2007. Hyperspectral field measurements were performed and spectral sampling of three commonly used sensors (Landsat-5 TM, SPOT5 and IKONOS) as well as the one for the future ESA Sentinel-2 satellite was simulated. LAI was retrieved with a radiative transfer model (RTM) based LUT inversion and two (semi-) empirical approaches using NDVI and WDVI. Surface albedo estimation was compared between the traditional weighting coefficient method and RTM simulation. LAI could be best estimated using the LUT approach based on the Sentinel-2 sensor configuration (RMSE = 0.59). For surface albedo, the physical model achieved the more realistic results compared to field measurements with a net radiometer. Results are discussed in view of operational monitoring applications for agriculture.