English
 
Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Industrial CO2 transport in Germany: Comparison of pipeline routing scenarios

Authors
/persons/resource/yeates

Yeates,  Christopher
4.3 Geoenergy, 4.0 Geosystems, Departments, GFZ Publication Database, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum;

Abdelshafy,  Ali
External Organizations;

/persons/resource/conny

Schmidt-Hattenberger,  Cornelia
4.3 Geoenergy, 4.0 Geosystems, Departments, GFZ Publication Database, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum;

Walther,  Grit
External Organizations;

External Ressource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (public)

5030012.pdf
(Publisher version), 12MB

Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Yeates, C., Abdelshafy, A., Schmidt-Hattenberger, C., Walther, G. (2024): Industrial CO2 transport in Germany: Comparison of pipeline routing scenarios. - International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 137, 104225.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2024.104225


Cite as: https://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_5030012
Abstract
Carbon capture and storage will be necessary for some industries to reach carbon neutrality. One of the main associated challenges is the design of the network linking the CO2 sources to the storage sites. Establishing a CO2 network can be impacted by many uncertainties such as CO2 amounts, pipeline routes and the locations of emitters and carbon sinks. We present a framework to investigate different scenarios of a future CO2 network in Germany. The analyses compare the routes and associated costs of different scenarios. The developed model uses several geospatial datasets and an optimization scheme to yield realistic and cost-efficient outcomes. Parameters such as population density and existing infrastructure are integrated to calculate potential routes, which are then used as an input for the developed heuristic model to determine the optimum network. The derived framework is flexible and can be used for investigating other scenarios, regions and settings. The results show that the different scenarios have a profound impact on the optimal layout and costs. The investment costs of the investigated scenarios range between 1.3 and 3 billion EUR. The outcomes are important for academia, industry and policymaking for the ongoing discussions regarding the development of carbon infrastructure.