Deutsch
 
Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT

Freigegeben

Bericht

Memorandum on the Open Access Transformation at the Helmholtz Association - Position Paper of the Working Groups “Open Science” and “Library and Information Management”

Urheber*innen

The Joint Open Access Transformation Task Group of the Working Groups “Open Science” and “Library and Information Management” and the Helmholtz Open Science Office, 
Helmholtz Open Science Office, External Organizations;

Externe Ressourcen
Volltexte (frei zugänglich)

2024_OA-Memorandum-2.0_Eng_a.pdf
(Verlagsversion), 497KB

Ergänzendes Material (frei zugänglich)
Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Ergänzenden Materialien verfügbar
Zitation

The Joint Open Access Transformation Task Group of the Working Groups “Open Science” and “Library and Information Management” and the Helmholtz Open Science Office (Ed.) (2025): Memorandum on the Open Access Transformation at the Helmholtz Association - Position Paper of the Working Groups “Open Science” and “Library and Information Management”, Potsdam : Helmholtz Open Science Office, 10 p.
https://doi.org/10.48440/os.helmholtz.079


Zitierlink: https://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_5032879
Zusammenfassung
The open access movement, which was set in motion at the latest by the Berlin Declaration in 2003, went hand in hand with the goal of transforming the scholarly publishing system to open access to research results by default. However, this complete switch to open access— the “open access transformation”—which has also been formulated as a goal in many strategy papers, has not yet been achieved. The “transformative agreements” concluded for its implementation, which go beyond reading access to subscription-based journals by also providing for fee-based open access publishing options (read-and-publish or publish-and-read), have led to increases in open access, but primarily at article level. The conversion of entire journals to open access has largely failed to materialize. Whether transformative agreements can be considered a success, and whether changing the contractual model—and thus the business model—to publication costs can be regarded as a genuine paradigm shift, is therefore the subject of controversial debate. This debate is accompanied by critical discussions of the side effects of this changed publishing landscape, such as the boosting of the number of publications and launches of new hybrid journal with the aim of increasing revenue from publication charges, dubious publishing models (predatory publishing), and data tracking by publishers. At the same time, there have been numerous developments in the area of scholarled publishing and clear calls for it to be strengthened. The open access transformation is also the subject of discussions at the Helmholtz Association. In the spring of 2021, the two working groups “Open Science” and “Library and Information Management” drew up an “Internal Memorandum on Open Access Transformation at the Helmholtz Association,” which focused on establishing a position for the then-upcoming negotiations for the DEAL agreements. The unpublished paper served to establish the internal Helmholtz position (informing the Head Office, Helmholtz’s participation in MPDL Services gGmbH [MPDLS for short]). In addition, in round table discussions of the Alliance of Science Organisations in Germany, it contributed to the implementation of the open access strategy within the framework of the then Priority Initiative “Digital Information.” The present memorandum moves away from this fixation on the DEAL agreements and focuses on the open access transformation as a whole. It develops perspectives and positions for Helmholtz on the future promotion of the open access transformation. In doing so, it considers experiences to date with transformative agreements with commercial providers in the context of the working group “Forum 13+,” experiences gained from the DEAL agreements concluded in 2023 and valid until 2028, the lively debate on scholar-led publishing, and the further development of the gold open access journal landscape. In addition, the memorandum serves both as a basis for the further formation of opinions at the Helmholtz centers and for the further development of the open access strategy of the Alliance of Science Organisations in Germany in the priority area “Digitality in Science.”1 Furthermore, it can contribute to the general assessment of transformation processes in the broader open access landscape.