Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONEN

Dieser Datensatz wurde verworfen!DetailsÜbersicht

Verworfen

Zeitschriftenartikel

From Pilot to Demo Scale – Comparing Ketzin results with the Illinois Basin-decatur Project

Urheber*innen

/persons/resource/streibel

Streibel, M.
CGS Centre for Geological Storage, Geoengineering Centres, GFZ Publication Database, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum;

Finley, Robert J.
External Organizations;

/persons/resource/martens

Martens, S.
CGS Centre for Geological Storage, Geoengineering Centres, GFZ Publication Database, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum;

Greenberg, Sallie
External Organizations;

/persons/resource/cgstech

Moeller, F.
CGS Centre for Geological Storage, Geoengineering Centres, GFZ Publication Database, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum;

/persons/resource/alieb

Liebscher, A.
CGS Centre for Geological Storage, Geoengineering Centres, GFZ Publication Database, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum;

Externe Ressourcen

Es sind keine externen Ressourcen hinterlegt

Volltexte (frei zugänglich)

Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Volltexte in GFZpublic verfügbar

Ergänzendes Material (frei zugänglich)

Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Ergänzenden Materialien verfügbar

Zitation

Streibel, M., Finley, R. J., Martens, S., Greenberg, S., Moeller, F., Liebscher, A. (2014): From Pilot to Demo Scale – Comparing Ketzin results with the Illinois Basin-decatur Project. - Energy Procedia, 63, 6323-6334.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.665

Zusammenfassung

The Ketzin pilot site and the Illinois Basin-Decatur Project (IBDP) are examples for successful onshore CO2 storage projects. Both projects aim to demonstrate the safe operation and efficient handling of CO2 storage in saline reservoirs representing different types of fluvial depositional systems and different reservoir pressure-temperature conditions. Major operational differences between both projects are the injection rates and the total amount of CO2 stored which will be about 15 times larger in the IBDP reservoir. This paper compares the operational settings and respective results of both projects and highlights similarities and differences which we consider to be important for large scale implementation of CO2 storage in such reservoirs.