date: 2016-06-22T14:06:09Z
pdf:PDFVersion: 1.6
pdf:docinfo:title:  Open Research Data, Data Portals and Data Publication ? an Introduction to the Data Curation Landscape 
xmp:CreatorTool: Prinect Printready
dc:description:  During the past decade, the relevance of research data stewardship has been rising significantly and data publication has become more familiar. Preservation of research data for long-term use, including its storage in adequate repositories has been identified as a key issue by the scientific community as well as by research agencies and the public. In practice, however, the current state of data sharing and re-use requires considerable improvement. This paper reviews recent developments in this area, and aims to provide some guidance to the increasing diversity of newly developed digital solutions, such as data journals, online data repositories, and citable digital object identifier (DOI) for datasets. We examine the differences and similarities between different examples of Arctic-related data management, including the newly created database of the Global Terrestrial Network for Permafrost GTN-P, a Canadian example of a (meta)data portal (Polar Data Catalogue), and examples of data repositories (e.g., PANGAEA, Nordicana D) and data journals (e.g., Earth System Science Data). We also describe the newly established Registry of Research Data Depositories (re3data.org) as a convenient resource for individual researchers to get an overview on and identify an appropriate repository for their scientific datasets as well for funding agencies during the evaluation process of the data management plan of research proposals. 
access_permission:modify_annotations: true
access_permission:can_print_degraded: true
subject:  During the past decade, the relevance of research data stewardship has been rising significantly and data publication has become more familiar. Preservation of research data for long-term use, including its storage in adequate repositories has been identified as a key issue by the scientific community as well as by research agencies and the public. In practice, however, the current state of data sharing and re-use requires considerable improvement. This paper reviews recent developments in this area, and aims to provide some guidance to the increasing diversity of newly developed digital solutions, such as data journals, online data repositories, and citable digital object identifier (DOI) for datasets. We examine the differences and similarities between different examples of Arctic-related data management, including the newly created database of the Global Terrestrial Network for Permafrost GTN-P, a Canadian example of a (meta)data portal (Polar Data Catalogue), and examples of data repositories (e.g., PANGAEA, Nordicana D) and data journals (e.g., Earth System Science Data). We also describe the newly established Registry of Research Data Depositories (re3data.org) as a convenient resource for individual researchers to get an overview on and identify an appropriate repository for their scientific datasets as well for funding agencies during the evaluation process of the data management plan of research proposals. 
dc:creator: Elger, K., Biskaborn, B., Pampel, H., Lantuit, H.
description:  During the past decade, the relevance of research data stewardship has been rising significantly and data publication has become more familiar. Preservation of research data for long-term use, including its storage in adequate repositories has been identified as a key issue by the scientific community as well as by research agencies and the public. In practice, however, the current state of data sharing and re-use requires considerable improvement. This paper reviews recent developments in this area, and aims to provide some guidance to the increasing diversity of newly developed digital solutions, such as data journals, online data repositories, and citable digital object identifier (DOI) for datasets. We examine the differences and similarities between different examples of Arctic-related data management, including the newly created database of the Global Terrestrial Network for Permafrost GTN-P, a Canadian example of a (meta)data portal (Polar Data Catalogue), and examples of data repositories (e.g., PANGAEA, Nordicana D) and data journals (e.g., Earth System Science Data). We also describe the newly established Registry of Research Data Depositories (re3data.org) as a convenient resource for individual researchers to get an overview on and identify an appropriate repository for their scientific datasets as well for funding agencies during the evaluation process of the data management plan of research proposals. 
dcterms:created: 2016-06-22T09:01:47Z
Last-Modified: 2016-06-22T14:06:09Z
dcterms:modified: 2016-06-22T14:06:09Z
dc:format: application/pdf; version=1.6
title:  Open Research Data, Data Portals and Data Publication ? an Introduction to the Data Curation Landscape 
xmpMM:DocumentID: uuid:99e2988c-a080-ab44-bfac-fb3ccd5036da
Last-Save-Date: 2016-06-22T14:06:09Z
pdf:docinfo:creator_tool: Prinect Printready
access_permission:fill_in_form: true
pdf:docinfo:modified: 2016-06-22T14:06:09Z
meta:save-date: 2016-06-22T14:06:09Z
pdf:encrypted: false
dc:title:  Open Research Data, Data Portals and Data Publication ? an Introduction to the Data Curation Landscape 
modified: 2016-06-22T14:06:09Z
cp:subject:  During the past decade, the relevance of research data stewardship has been rising significantly and data publication has become more familiar. Preservation of research data for long-term use, including its storage in adequate repositories has been identified as a key issue by the scientific community as well as by research agencies and the public. In practice, however, the current state of data sharing and re-use requires considerable improvement. This paper reviews recent developments in this area, and aims to provide some guidance to the increasing diversity of newly developed digital solutions, such as data journals, online data repositories, and citable digital object identifier (DOI) for datasets. We examine the differences and similarities between different examples of Arctic-related data management, including the newly created database of the Global Terrestrial Network for Permafrost GTN-P, a Canadian example of a (meta)data portal (Polar Data Catalogue), and examples of data repositories (e.g., PANGAEA, Nordicana D) and data journals (e.g., Earth System Science Data). We also describe the newly established Registry of Research Data Depositories (re3data.org) as a convenient resource for individual researchers to get an overview on and identify an appropriate repository for their scientific datasets as well for funding agencies during the evaluation process of the data management plan of research proposals. 
pdf:docinfo:subject:  During the past decade, the relevance of research data stewardship has been rising significantly and data publication has become more familiar. Preservation of research data for long-term use, including its storage in adequate repositories has been identified as a key issue by the scientific community as well as by research agencies and the public. In practice, however, the current state of data sharing and re-use requires considerable improvement. This paper reviews recent developments in this area, and aims to provide some guidance to the increasing diversity of newly developed digital solutions, such as data journals, online data repositories, and citable digital object identifier (DOI) for datasets. We examine the differences and similarities between different examples of Arctic-related data management, including the newly created database of the Global Terrestrial Network for Permafrost GTN-P, a Canadian example of a (meta)data portal (Polar Data Catalogue), and examples of data repositories (e.g., PANGAEA, Nordicana D) and data journals (e.g., Earth System Science Data). We also describe the newly established Registry of Research Data Depositories (re3data.org) as a convenient resource for individual researchers to get an overview on and identify an appropriate repository for their scientific datasets as well for funding agencies during the evaluation process of the data management plan of research proposals. 
Content-Type: application/pdf
pdf:docinfo:creator: Elger, K., Biskaborn, B., Pampel, H., Lantuit, H.
X-Parsed-By: org.apache.tika.parser.DefaultParser
creator: Elger, K., Biskaborn, B., Pampel, H., Lantuit, H.
meta:author: Elger, K., Biskaborn, B., Pampel, H., Lantuit, H.
meta:creation-date: 2016-06-22T09:01:47Z
created: Wed Jun 22 11:01:47 CEST 2016
access_permission:extract_for_accessibility: true
access_permission:assemble_document: true
xmpTPg:NPages: 15
Creation-Date: 2016-06-22T09:01:47Z
access_permission:extract_content: true
access_permission:can_print: true
Author: Elger, K., Biskaborn, B., Pampel, H., Lantuit, H.
producer: Prinect Printready
access_permission:can_modify: true
pdf:docinfo:producer: Prinect Printready
pdf:docinfo:created: 2016-06-22T09:01:47Z