English
 
Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
Add to Basket
  Local TagsRelease HistoryDetailsSummary

Released
Journal Article

Confidence intervals and sample size for estimating the prevalence of plastic debris in seabird nests

Authors

Tavares,  Davi Castro
External Organizations;

Moura,  Jailson Fulgêncio
External Organizations;

/persons/resource/acevedo

Acevedo-Trejos,  Esteban
0 Pre-GFZ, Departments, GFZ Publication Database, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum;

Crawford,  Robert J. M.
External Organizations;

Makhado,  Azwianewi
External Organizations;

Lavers,  Jennifer L.
External Organizations;

Witteveen,  Minke
External Organizations;

Ryan,  Peter G.
External Organizations;

Merico,  Agostino
External Organizations;

External Ressource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in GFZpublic
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Tavares, D. C., Moura, J. F., Acevedo-Trejos, E., Crawford, R. J. M., Makhado, A., Lavers, J. L., Witteveen, M., Ryan, P. G., Merico, A. (2020): Confidence intervals and sample size for estimating the prevalence of plastic debris in seabird nests. - Environmental Pollution, 263, Part A, 114394.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114394


Cite as: https://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_5008966
Abstract
Evidence is accumulating about the impacts of plastics on marine life. The prevalence of plastics in seabird nests has been used as an indicator of levels of this pollutant in the ocean. However, the lack of a framework for defining sample sizes and errors associated with estimating the prevalence of plastic in nests prevents researchers from optimising time and reducing impacts of fieldwork. We present a method to determine the confidence intervals for the prevalence of debris in seabird nests and provide, for the first time, information on the prevalence of these items in nests of the Hartlaub’s gull Larus hartlaubii, the African penguin Spheniscus demersus, the great white pelican Pelecanus onocrotalus, and the white-breasted cormorant Phalacrocorax lucidus in South Africa. The method, based on observations and resampling simulations and tested here for nests of 12 seabird species from 15 locations worldwide, allows for straightforward hypothesis testing. Appropriate sample sizes can be defined by combining this method with a Bayesian approach. We show that precise estimates of prevalence of debris in nests can be obtained by sampling around 250 nests. Smaller sample sizes can be useful for obtaining rough estimates. For the Hartlaub’s gull, the African penguin, the great white pelican, and the white-breasted cormorant, debris were present in 0.75%, 3.00%, 6.41%, and 25.62% of the respective nests. Our approach will help researchers to determine errors associated with the prevalence of debris recorded in seabird nests and to optimise time and costs spent collecting data. It can also be applied to estimate confidence intervals and define sample sizes for assessing prevalence of plastic ingestion by any organism.