date: 2024-01-09T10:10:28Z
pdf:PDFVersion: 1.4
pdf:docinfo:title: Combining atmospheric and non-tidal ocean loading effects to correct high precision gravity time-series
xmp:CreatorTool: OUP
Keywords: 
access_permission:modify_annotations: true
access_permission:can_print_degraded: true
subject: DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggad371 Geophysical Journal International, 236, 1, 26-09-2023. Abstract: In modelling atmospheric loading effects for terrestrial gravimetry, state-of-the-art approaches take advantage of numerical weather models to account for the global 3-D distribution of air masses. Deformation effects are often computed assuming the Inverse Barometer (IB) hypothesis to be generally valid over the oceans. By a revision of the IB assumption and its consequences we show that although the seafloor is not deformed by atmospheric pressure changes, there exists a fraction of ocean mass that current modelling schemes are usually not accounting for. This causes an overestimation of the atmospheric attraction effect over oceans, even when the dynamic response of the ocean to atmospheric pressure and wind is accounted through dynamic ocean models. This signal can reach a root mean square variability of a few nm s−2, depending on the location of the station. We therefore test atmospheric and non-tidal ocean loading effects at five superconducting gravimeter (SG) stations, showing that a better representation of the residual gravity variations is found when Newtonian attraction effects due to the IB response of the ocean are correctly considered. A sliding window variance analysis shows that the main reduction takes place for periods between 5 and 10 d, even for stations far away from the oceans. Since periods of non-tidal ocean mass variability closely resemble atmospheric signals recorded by SGs, we recommend to directly incorporate both an ocean component together with the IB into services that provide weather-related corrections for terrestrial gravimetry.
dc:creator: Antokoletz E. D., Wziontek H., Dobslaw H., Balidakis K., Klügel T., Oreiro F. A., Tocho C. N.
dcterms:created: 2023-11-22T04:36:11Z
Last-Modified: 2024-01-09T10:10:28Z
dcterms:modified: 2024-01-09T10:10:28Z
dc:format: application/pdf; version=1.4
title: Combining atmospheric and non-tidal ocean loading effects to correct high precision gravity time-series
Last-Save-Date: 2024-01-09T10:10:28Z
pdf:docinfo:creator_tool: OUP
access_permission:fill_in_form: true
pdf:docinfo:keywords: 
pdf:docinfo:modified: 2024-01-09T10:10:28Z
meta:save-date: 2024-01-09T10:10:28Z
pdf:encrypted: false
dc:title: Combining atmospheric and non-tidal ocean loading effects to correct high precision gravity time-series
modified: 2024-01-09T10:10:28Z
cp:subject: DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggad371 Geophysical Journal International, 236, 1, 26-09-2023. Abstract: In modelling atmospheric loading effects for terrestrial gravimetry, state-of-the-art approaches take advantage of numerical weather models to account for the global 3-D distribution of air masses. Deformation effects are often computed assuming the Inverse Barometer (IB) hypothesis to be generally valid over the oceans. By a revision of the IB assumption and its consequences we show that although the seafloor is not deformed by atmospheric pressure changes, there exists a fraction of ocean mass that current modelling schemes are usually not accounting for. This causes an overestimation of the atmospheric attraction effect over oceans, even when the dynamic response of the ocean to atmospheric pressure and wind is accounted through dynamic ocean models. This signal can reach a root mean square variability of a few nm s−2, depending on the location of the station. We therefore test atmospheric and non-tidal ocean loading effects at five superconducting gravimeter (SG) stations, showing that a better representation of the residual gravity variations is found when Newtonian attraction effects due to the IB response of the ocean are correctly considered. A sliding window variance analysis shows that the main reduction takes place for periods between 5 and 10 d, even for stations far away from the oceans. Since periods of non-tidal ocean mass variability closely resemble atmospheric signals recorded by SGs, we recommend to directly incorporate both an ocean component together with the IB into services that provide weather-related corrections for terrestrial gravimetry.
pdf:docinfo:subject: DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggad371 Geophysical Journal International, 236, 1, 26-09-2023. Abstract: In modelling atmospheric loading effects for terrestrial gravimetry, state-of-the-art approaches take advantage of numerical weather models to account for the global 3-D distribution of air masses. Deformation effects are often computed assuming the Inverse Barometer (IB) hypothesis to be generally valid over the oceans. By a revision of the IB assumption and its consequences we show that although the seafloor is not deformed by atmospheric pressure changes, there exists a fraction of ocean mass that current modelling schemes are usually not accounting for. This causes an overestimation of the atmospheric attraction effect over oceans, even when the dynamic response of the ocean to atmospheric pressure and wind is accounted through dynamic ocean models. This signal can reach a root mean square variability of a few nm s−2, depending on the location of the station. We therefore test atmospheric and non-tidal ocean loading effects at five superconducting gravimeter (SG) stations, showing that a better representation of the residual gravity variations is found when Newtonian attraction effects due to the IB response of the ocean are correctly considered. A sliding window variance analysis shows that the main reduction takes place for periods between 5 and 10 d, even for stations far away from the oceans. Since periods of non-tidal ocean mass variability closely resemble atmospheric signals recorded by SGs, we recommend to directly incorporate both an ocean component together with the IB into services that provide weather-related corrections for terrestrial gravimetry.
Content-Type: application/pdf
pdf:docinfo:creator: Antokoletz E. D., Wziontek H., Dobslaw H., Balidakis K., Klügel T., Oreiro F. A., Tocho C. N.
X-Parsed-By: org.apache.tika.parser.DefaultParser
creator: Antokoletz E. D., Wziontek H., Dobslaw H., Balidakis K., Klügel T., Oreiro F. A., Tocho C. N.
meta:author: Antokoletz E. D., Wziontek H., Dobslaw H., Balidakis K., Klügel T., Oreiro F. A., Tocho C. N.
dc:subject: 
meta:creation-date: 2023-11-22T04:36:11Z
created: Wed Nov 22 05:36:11 CET 2023
X-TIKA:EXCEPTION:warn: org.xml.sax.SAXParseException; lineNumber: 5; columnNumber: 17; The prefix "pdf" for element "pdf:Keywords" is not bound.
	at org.apache.xerces.parsers.DOMParser.parse(DOMParser.java:245)
	at org.apache.xerces.jaxp.DocumentBuilderImpl.parse(DocumentBuilderImpl.java:298)
	at javax.xml.parsers.DocumentBuilder.parse(DocumentBuilder.java:121)
	at org.apache.tika.parser.pdf.PDFParser.loadDOM(PDFParser.java:732)
	at org.apache.tika.parser.pdf.PDFParser.extractMetadata(PDFParser.java:226)
	at org.apache.tika.parser.pdf.PDFParser.parse(PDFParser.java:154)
	at org.apache.tika.parser.CompositeParser.parse(CompositeParser.java:280)
	at org.apache.tika.parser.CompositeParser.parse(CompositeParser.java:280)
	at org.apache.tika.parser.AutoDetectParser.parse(AutoDetectParser.java:135)
	at de.mpg.mpdl.inge.service.pubman.impl.FileServiceFSImpl.getFileMetadata(FileServiceFSImpl.java:449)
	at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor1053.invoke(Unknown Source)
	at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
	at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
	at org.springframework.aop.support.AopUtils.invokeJoinpointUsingReflection(AopUtils.java:333)
	at org.springframework.aop.framework.JdkDynamicAopProxy.invoke(JdkDynamicAopProxy.java:207)
	at com.sun.proxy.$Proxy146.getFileMetadata(Unknown Source)
	at de.mpg.mpdl.inge.rest.web.controller.ItemRestController.getTechnicalMetadataByTika(ItemRestController.java:298)
	at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor1052.invoke(Unknown Source)
	at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
	at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
	at org.springframework.web.method.support.InvocableHandlerMethod.doInvoke(InvocableHandlerMethod.java:205)
	at org.springframework.web.method.support.InvocableHandlerMethod.invokeForRequest(InvocableHandlerMethod.java:133)
	at org.springframework.web.servlet.mvc.method.annotation.ServletInvocableHandlerMethod.invokeAndHandle(ServletInvocableHandlerMethod.java:97)
	at org.springframework.web.servlet.mvc.method.annotation.RequestMappingHandlerAdapter.invokeHandlerMethod(RequestMappingHandlerAdapter.java:827)
	at org.springframework.web.servlet.mvc.method.annotation.RequestMappingHandlerAdapter.handleInternal(RequestMappingHandlerAdapter.java:738)
	at org.springframework.web.servlet.mvc.method.AbstractHandlerMethodAdapter.handle(AbstractHandlerMethodAdapter.java:85)
	at org.springframework.web.servlet.DispatcherServlet.doDispatch(DispatcherServlet.java:967)
	at org.springframework.web.servlet.DispatcherServlet.doService(DispatcherServlet.java:901)
	at org.springframework.web.servlet.FrameworkServlet.processRequest(FrameworkServlet.java:970)
	at org.springframework.web.servlet.FrameworkServlet.doGet(FrameworkServlet.java:861)
	at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:687)
	at org.springframework.web.servlet.FrameworkServlet.service(FrameworkServlet.java:846)
	at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:790)
	at io.undertow.servlet.handlers.ServletHandler.handleRequest(ServletHandler.java:74)
	at io.undertow.servlet.handlers.FilterHandler$FilterChainImpl.doFilter(FilterHandler.java:129)
	at de.mpg.mpdl.inge.rest.web.spring.AuthCookieToHeaderFilter.doFilter(AuthCookieToHeaderFilter.java:113)
	at io.undertow.servlet.core.ManagedFilter.doFilter(ManagedFilter.java:61)
	at io.undertow.servlet.handlers.FilterHandler$FilterChainImpl.doFilter(FilterHandler.java:131)
	at org.springframework.web.filter.CharacterEncodingFilter.doFilterInternal(CharacterEncodingFilter.java:197)
	at org.springframework.web.filter.OncePerRequestFilter.doFilter(OncePerRequestFilter.java:107)
	at io.undertow.servlet.core.ManagedFilter.doFilter(ManagedFilter.java:61)
	at io.undertow.servlet.handlers.FilterHandler$FilterChainImpl.doFilter(FilterHandler.java:131)
	at io.undertow.servlet.handlers.FilterHandler.handleRequest(FilterHandler.java:84)
	at io.undertow.servlet.handlers.ServletChain$1.handleRequest(ServletChain.java:68)
	at io.undertow.servlet.handlers.ServletDispatchingHandler.handleRequest(ServletDispatchingHandler.java:36)
	at org.wildfly.extension.undertow.deployment.GlobalRequestControllerHandler.handleRequest(GlobalRequestControllerHandler.java:68)
	at io.undertow.server.handlers.PredicateHandler.handleRequest(PredicateHandler.java:43)
	at io.undertow.servlet.handlers.ServletInitialHandler.handleFirstRequest(ServletInitialHandler.java:292)
	at io.undertow.servlet.handlers.ServletInitialHandler.access$100(ServletInitialHandler.java:81)
	at io.undertow.servlet.handlers.ServletInitialHandler$2.call(ServletInitialHandler.java:138)
	at io.undertow.servlet.handlers.ServletInitialHandler$2.call(ServletInitialHandler.java:135)
	at io.undertow.servlet.core.ServletRequestContextThreadSetupAction$1.call(ServletRequestContextThreadSetupAction.java:48)
	at io.undertow.servlet.core.ContextClassLoaderSetupAction$1.call(ContextClassLoaderSetupAction.java:43)
	at org.wildfly.extension.undertow.deployment.UndertowDeploymentInfoService$UndertowThreadSetupAction.lambda$create$0(UndertowDeploymentInfoService.java:1514)
	at org.wildfly.extension.undertow.deployment.UndertowDeploymentInfoService$UndertowThreadSetupAction.lambda$create$0(UndertowDeploymentInfoService.java:1514)
	at org.wildfly.extension.undertow.deployment.UndertowDeploymentInfoService$UndertowThreadSetupAction.lambda$create$0(UndertowDeploymentInfoService.java:1514)
	at io.undertow.servlet.handlers.ServletInitialHandler.dispatchRequest(ServletInitialHandler.java:272)
	at io.undertow.servlet.handlers.ServletInitialHandler.access$000(ServletInitialHandler.java:81)
	at io.undertow.servlet.handlers.ServletInitialHandler$1.handleRequest(ServletInitialHandler.java:104)
	at io.undertow.server.Connectors.executeRootHandler(Connectors.java:360)
	at io.undertow.server.HttpServerExchange$1.run(HttpServerExchange.java:830)
	at org.jboss.threads.ContextClassLoaderSavingRunnable.run(ContextClassLoaderSavingRunnable.java:35)
	at org.jboss.threads.EnhancedQueueExecutor.safeRun(EnhancedQueueExecutor.java:1985)
	at org.jboss.threads.EnhancedQueueExecutor$ThreadBody.doRunTask(EnhancedQueueExecutor.java:1487)
	at org.jboss.threads.EnhancedQueueExecutor$ThreadBody.run(EnhancedQueueExecutor.java:1378)
	at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:750)

access_permission:extract_for_accessibility: true
access_permission:assemble_document: true
xmpTPg:NPages: 11
Creation-Date: 2023-11-22T04:36:11Z
access_permission:extract_content: true
access_permission:can_print: true
pdf:docinfo:custom:doi: 10.1093/gji/ggad371
meta:keyword: 
Author: Antokoletz E. D., Wziontek H., Dobslaw H., Balidakis K., Klügel T., Oreiro F. A., Tocho C. N.
producer: Acrobat Distiller 23.0 (Windows); modified using iTextSharp 5.5.10 ©2000-2016 iText Group NV (AGPL-version)
access_permission:can_modify: true
pdf:docinfo:producer: Acrobat Distiller 23.0 (Windows); modified using iTextSharp 5.5.10 ©2000-2016 iText Group NV (AGPL-version)
pdf:docinfo:created: 2023-11-22T04:36:11Z
doi: 10.1093/gji/ggad371