English
 
Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Laboratory Shear Behavior of Tensile- and Shear-Induced Fractures in Sandstone: Insights from Acoustic Emission

Authors

Miao,  Shuting
External Organizations;

Pan,  Peng-Zhi
External Organizations;

/persons/resource/zang

Zang,  Arno
2.6 Seismic Hazard and Risk Dynamics, 2.0 Geophysics, Departments, GFZ Publication Database, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum;

Zhang,  Chuanqing
External Organizations;

Hofmann,  Hannes
External Organizations;

Ji,  Yinlin
External Organizations;

External Ressource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in GFZpublic
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Miao, S., Pan, P.-Z., Zang, A., Zhang, C., Hofmann, H., Ji, Y. (2024 online): Laboratory Shear Behavior of Tensile- and Shear-Induced Fractures in Sandstone: Insights from Acoustic Emission. - Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-024-03780-2


Cite as: https://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_5025411
Abstract
The distinction between the shear behavior of tensile- and shear-induced fractures is critical to understanding the deformation and failure of geologic discontinuities at different scales. To investigate these differences, a series of direct shear tests were performed on sandstone specimens with a continuous fracture created by either splitting or shearing. The acoustic emission (AE) technique was used to examine variations in grain-size cracking behavior between specimens with tensile- and shear-induced fractures. An increase in normal stress for both fracture types correlates with increased microcrack density and energy release. However, there are notable differences: during the shear process, tensile-induced fractures produce AE sequences similar to the seismic patterns observed along natural tectonic faults, with foreshocks, mainshocks, and aftershocks. In contrast, the AE sequence for shear-induced fractures during the shear process lacks prominent mainshocks and deviates progressively from the power-law function with time as normal stress increases. In addition, the AE b-value for tension-induced fractures initially shows a gradual decrease as the mainshock approaches and then slowly increases during the aftershock period. In contrast, the b-value remains nearly constant for shear-induced fractures due to the low roughness and heterogeneity of the fracture surface. These differences highlight the strong correlation between AE responses and fault heterogeneity, paving the way for fault characterization and risk assessment in subsurface energy extraction.