English
 
Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
Add to Basket
  Local TagsRelease HistoryDetailsSummary

Released
Journal Article

High-frequency seismic radiation from Maule earthquake (Mw 8.8, 2010 February 27) inferred from high-resolution backprojection analysis

Authors
/persons/resource/mpalo

Palo,  M.
2.4 Seismology, 2.0 Physics of the Earth, Departments, GFZ Publication Database, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum;
Publikationen aller GIPP-unterstützten Projekte, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum;
GEOFON, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum;

/persons/resource/tilmann

Tilmann,  F.
2.4 Seismology, 2.0 Physics of the Earth, Departments, GFZ Publication Database, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum;
Publikationen aller GIPP-unterstützten Projekte, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum;
GEOFON, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum;

Krüger,  F.
External Organizations;
Publikationen aller GIPP-unterstützten Projekte, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum;
GEOFON, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum;

Ehlert,  L.
External Organizations;
Publikationen aller GIPP-unterstützten Projekte, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum;
GEOFON, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum;

Lange,  D.
External Organizations;
Publikationen aller GIPP-unterstützten Projekte, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum;
GEOFON, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum;

External Ressource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (public)

599903.pdf
(Publisher version), 4MB

Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Palo, M., Tilmann, F., Krüger, F., Ehlert, L., Lange, D. (2014): High-frequency seismic radiation from Maule earthquake (Mw 8.8, 2010 February 27) inferred from high-resolution backprojection analysis. - Geophysical Journal International, 199, 2, 1058-1077.
https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggu311


Cite as: https://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_599903
Abstract
The Maule earthquake (2010 February 27, Mw 8.8, Chile) broke the subduction megathrust along a previously locked segment. Based on an international aftershock deployment, catalogues of precisely located aftershocks have become available. Using 23 well-located aftershocks, we calibrate the classic teleseismic backprojection procedure to map the highfrequency seismic radiation emitted during the earthquake. The calibration corrects traveltimes in a standard earth model both with a static term specific to each station, and a ‘dynamic’ term specific to each combination of grid point and station. The second term has been interpolated over the whole slipping area by kriging, and is about an order of magnitude smaller than the static term. This procedure ensures that the teleseismic images of rupture development are properly located with respect to aftershocks recorded with local networks and does not depend on accurate hypocentre location of the main shock. We track a bilateral rupture propagation lasting ∼160 s, with its dominant branch rupturing northeastwards at about 3 kms−1. The area of maximum energy emission is offset from the maximum coseismic slip but matches the zone where most plate interface aftershocks occur. Along dip, energy is preferentially released from two disconnected interface belts, and a distinct jump from the shallower belt to the deeper one is visible after about 20 s from the onset. However, both belts keep on being active until the end of the rupture. These belts approximately match the position of the interface aftershocks, which are split into two clusters of events at different depths, thus suggesting the existence of a repeated transition from stick-slip to creeping frictional regime.