Deutsch
 
Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT

Freigegeben

Konferenzbeitrag

Testing machine learning models for building damage assessment applied to the Italian Database of Observed Damage (DaDO)

Urheber*innen

Ghimire,  Subash
IUGG 2023, General Assemblies, 1 General, International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics (IUGG), External Organizations;

Gueguen,  Philippe
IUGG 2023, General Assemblies, 1 General, International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics (IUGG), External Organizations;

Externe Ressourcen
Es sind keine externen Ressourcen hinterlegt
Volltexte (frei zugänglich)
Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Volltexte in GFZpublic verfügbar
Ergänzendes Material (frei zugänglich)
Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Ergänzenden Materialien verfügbar
Zitation

Ghimire, S., Gueguen, P. (2023): Testing machine learning models for building damage assessment applied to the Italian Database of Observed Damage (DaDO), XXVIII General Assembly of the International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics (IUGG) (Berlin 2023).
https://doi.org/10.57757/IUGG23-3062


Zitierlink: https://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_5020384
Zusammenfassung
Assessing or forecasting seismic damage to buildings is an essential issue for earthquake disaster management. In this framework, we tested six machine learning models on the DaDO database of observed damage from Italian earthquakes to assess their efficacy in characterizing seismic damage. The models included random forest, gradient boosting, and extreme gradient boosting. The input features were all or a subset of the structural features provided by DaDO, as well as macroseismic intensity. Extreme gradient boosting classification performed best, especially when using basic structural features (age, number of storeys, floor area, building height) and grouping damage according to the traffic-light-based system used, for example, during the post-disaster period (green, yellow, and red). The machine learning-based model had similar efficacy to the traditional Risk-UE method. Finally, the importance of structural features varied depending on the level of damage considered.