English
 
Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Conference Paper

Predicting and Fingerprinting Climate Change using Linear Response Theory

Authors

Lucarini,  Valerio
IUGG 2023, General Assemblies, 1 General, International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics (IUGG), External Organizations;

External Ressource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in GFZpublic
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Lucarini, V. (2023): Predicting and Fingerprinting Climate Change using Linear Response Theory, XXVIII General Assembly of the International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics (IUGG) (Berlin 2023).
https://doi.org/10.57757/IUGG23-3533


Cite as: https://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_5020449
Abstract
Response theory (RT) for nonequilibrium systems provides powerful tools for understanding the link between climate variability and climate change, for performing climate change projections and for understanding the fundamental properties of tipping points. We will recapitulate the theoretical basis of the theory as well as some case studies in climate models of different level of complexity. We will also show how RT provides a useful angle for better framing some key fundamental issues associated with geoengineering strategies. Finally, we will present recent results suggesting that RT provides the physical and mathematical foundations behind optimal fingerprinting methods for climate change detection and attribution (D&A). D&A studies have played a major role in shaping contemporary climate science and have provided key motivations supporting global climate policy negotiations. Such studies have shown how to associate observed climatic patterns of climate change with acting forcings - both anthropogenic and natural ones - with the goal of making statements on the acting drivers of climate change. D&A techniques are based on the concept of Pearl causality: one investigates the changes in a system following the adoption of alternative courses of action. Our angle allows one to clearly frame assumptions, strengths and potential pitfalls of optimal fingerprinting methods. The take-home message is that, by and large, detection and attribution is based upon a solid framework but one should re-examine classical notions of natural variability by considering the concept of snapshot/pullback attractor.