Uncertainties in practical simulation of CO2 storage

Nordbotten, J. M.; Flemisch, B.; Gasda, S. E.; Nilsen, H. M.; Fan, Y.; Pickup, G. E.; Wiese, Bernd; Celia, M. A.; Dahle, H. K.; Eigestad, G. T.; Pruess, K.

doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.03.007

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Add to Basket

Local TagsRelease HistoryDetailsSummary

Released

Journal Article

Uncertainties in practical simulation of CO2 storage

Authors

Nordbotten, J. M.
External Organizations;

Flemisch, B.
External Organizations;

Gasda, S. E.
External Organizations;

Nilsen, H. M.
External Organizations;

Fan, Y.
External Organizations;

Pickup, G. E.
External Organizations;

/persons/resource/wiese

Wiese, Bernd
CGS Centre for Geological Storage, Geoengineering Centres, GFZ Publication Database, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum;

Celia, M. A.
External Organizations;

Dahle, H. K.
External Organizations;

Eigestad, G. T.
External Organizations;

Pruess, K.
External Organizations;

External Ressource

No external resources are shared

Fulltext (public)

There are no public fulltexts stored in GFZpublic

Supplementary Material (public)

There is no public supplementary material available

Citation

Nordbotten, J. M., Flemisch, B., Gasda, S. E., Nilsen, H. M., Fan, Y., Pickup, G. E., Wiese, B., Celia, M. A., Dahle, H. K., Eigestad, G. T., Pruess, K. (2012): Uncertainties in practical simulation of CO2 storage. - International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 9, 234-242.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.03.007

https://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_247539

Abstract

Practical simulation of CO2 storage in geological formations inherently involves decisions concerning relevant physics, upscaling, and numerical modeling. These decisions are unavoidable, since the full problem cannot be resolved by existing numerical approaches. Here, we report on the impact of three distinct approaches to make the problem computationally tractable: reduced physics, upscaling, and non-converged discretizations. Compounding these different strategies, we have used a benchmark study to try to assess the impact of an expert group on the results of the numerical simulations. In order to restrict the scope of the investigation, the geometric and geological description of the storage aquifer was simplified to the greatest extent possible. The different strategies applied to simplify the problem, lead to significantly deviating answers when addressing relevant storage questions. Furthermore, there is room for interpretation when complex simulation results are simplified to the type of higher-level information sought in decision making processes. Our experience leads us to conclude that, important questions relating to CO2 storage cannot be predicted convincingly to satisfactory accuracy with numerical simulation tools, even for highly idealized problems. This emphasizes the need for real-time monitoring and history matching during injection operations.