The Storfjorden, Svalbard, 2008–2012 aftershock sequence: Seismotectonics in a 
polar environment

Pirli, Myrto; Schweitzer, Johannes; Paulsen, Berit

doi:10.1016/j.tecto.2013.05.010

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Add to Basket

Local TagsRelease HistoryDetailsSummary

Released

Journal Article

The Storfjorden, Svalbard, 2008–2012 aftershock sequence: Seismotectonics in a polar environment

Authors

Pirli, Myrto
External Organizations;
GEOFON, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum;

Schweitzer, Johannes
External Organizations;
GEOFON, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum;

Paulsen, Berit
External Organizations;
GEOFON, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum;

External Ressource

No external resources are shared

Fulltext (public)

There are no public fulltexts stored in GFZpublic

Supplementary Material (public)

There is no public supplementary material available

Citation

Pirli, M., Schweitzer, J., Paulsen, B. (2013): The Storfjorden, Svalbard, 2008–2012 aftershock sequence: Seismotectonics in a polar environment. - Tectonophysics, 601, 192-205.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2013.05.010

Cite as: https://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_3103893

Abstract

A long, complex aftershock sequence has followed an Mw 6.1 mainshock in February 2008, in Storfjorden, Svalbard. Relatively located aftershock epicenters and focal mechanisms from moment tensor inversion suggest that the series took place along a NE–SW trending and steeply SSE dipping oblique-normal fault, with the total aftershock extent exceeding the mainshock rupture. The magnitude of the mainshock and the duration of the aftershock activity render the Storfjorden sequence important in terms of earthquake hazard assessment in the Svalbard region. We have evaluated all involved uncertainties and combined seismological information with background knowledge for the area, in order to achieve as sound a seismotectonic interpretation as possible. Our results clearly indicate that the activity in Storfjorden should be attributed to a previously unknown tectonic structure. In addition, there are indications of activation of secondary structures and possibly of stress triggering. These new findings affect our understanding of the region's earthquake potential.