Processed seismic data and ERT inversion models used in the estimation of 
injected masses for the Ketzin CO2 pilot project for the years 2009 and 2012

Weinzierl, Wolfgang; Ganzer, Merlin; Rippe, Dennis; Lueth, S.; Schmidt-Hattenberger, Cornelia

doi:10.5880/GFZ.4.8.2021.004

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Add to Basket

Local TagsRelease HistoryDetailsSummary

Released

Data Publication

Processed seismic data and ERT inversion models used in the estimation of injected masses for the Ketzin CO2 pilot project for the years 2009 and 2012

Authors

/persons/resource/wolfgang

Weinzierl, Wolfgang
4.8 Geoenergy, 4.0 Geosystems, Departments, GFZ Publication Database, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum;

/persons/resource/ganzer

Ganzer, Merlin
4.8 Geoenergy, 4.0 Geosystems, Departments, GFZ Publication Database, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum;

/persons/resource/rippe

Rippe, Dennis
4.8 Geoenergy, 4.0 Geosystems, Departments, GFZ Publication Database, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum;

/persons/resource/slueth

Lueth, S.
2.2 Geophysical Imaging of the Subsurface, 2.0 Geophysics, Departments, GFZ Publication Database, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum;

/persons/resource/conny

Schmidt-Hattenberger, Cornelia
4.8 Geoenergy, 4.0 Geosystems, Departments, GFZ Publication Database, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum;

External Ressource

No external resources are shared

Fulltext (public)

There are no public fulltexts stored in GFZpublic

Supplementary Material (public)

There is no public supplementary material available

Citation

Weinzierl, W., Ganzer, M., Rippe, D., Lueth, S., Schmidt-Hattenberger, C. (2021): Processed seismic data and ERT inversion models used in the estimation of injected masses for the Ketzin CO2 pilot project for the years 2009 and 2012.
https://doi.org/10.5880/GFZ.4.8.2021.004

Cite as: https://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_5007088

Abstract

Seismic and geoelectric/electro-magnetic methods are used as complementary tools for the identification of fluid/gas effects in underground storage and production scenarios. Both methods generally have very different resolution. Seismic tends to be acquired by much more dense geometrical layouts and the geoelectric or electro-magnetic acquisition being a potential field method shows information integrated over spatial distances. These inherent scale and design dependent differences require spatial tuning in joint inversion approaches and careful matching in independent interpretations of both methods. We present results matching seismic and electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) results from two repeat surveys acquired during CO2 storage operations at the Ketzin pilot site in Germany. Datasets are provided in HDF5 format and grouped in different levels. Two main levels exist. Raw data includes processed seismic data and ERT inversion results. Seismic mass estimation relies on amplitude differences and timeshifts. ERT inversion results have been converted from VTK. Please read the data description file for more information.