Zusammenfassung
Tourmaline and white mica are common gangue minerals in hydrothermal ore deposits. These minerals are the most abundant alteration phases throughout the Panasqueira W-Sn-Cu deposit and, therefore, the prime indicators for the composition and source of the mineralizing fluids. The deposit consists of sub-horizontal ore-bearing
quartz veins hosted by metasedimentary rocks above a late-Variscan granite and its greisen cupola (e.g., Kelly & Rye, 1979). This contribution summarizes the results of three studies that combine in-situ analyses of major elements by
EPMA, trace elements by laser ablation ICP-MS, and boron isotopes by SIMS in tourmaline and white mica at the
Panasqueira deposit (Codeço et al., 2017, 2019, 2021). The SIMS results were also used to test the application
of B-isotope exchange between muscovite and tourmaline as a geothermometer (Codeço et al., 2019). In addition,
the bulk chemical changes caused by the hydrothermal alteration are addressed, based on analyses of altered and
unaltered host rocks, granite, and greisen from drill core samples presented by Codeço et al. (2021). Whole-rock data from altered host rocks show enrichments in W, Sn, Cu, Zn, As, F, Li, Rb, and Cs relative to the unaltered metasediments. Most of these elements are also enriched in the greisen relative to the unaltered granite. The observed variations in whole-rock composition with distance to ore veins reflect the alteration intensity and different modal abundances of tourmaline and mica
(Codeço et al., 2021). Tourmaline has intermediate schorl-dravite compositions and is chemically zoned, with increases in Fe/Mg and F from core to rim, while Ca and Al contents
decrease (Codeço et al., 2017). White mica comprises muscovite, phengite, and celadonite components and has systematic variations in Fe/Mg according to the setting within the deposit (greisen, vein selvage, alteration zone, late mineralized fault), indicating an evolution with time (Codeço et al., 2019). In contrast, tourmaline compositions
are similar throughout the deposit (but greisen is tourmaline-free). This is ascribed to a stronger dependence
of tourmaline on host-rock compositions, while white mica is the better recorder of the changing fluid
composition (Codeço et al., 2021). The in-situ trace-element data show that Rb, Cs, Ba, Li, Nb, Ta, W, and Sn
are preferentially partitioned into white mica over tourmaline while Zn, V, and Sr show the opposite trend (Fig.
1) (Codeço et al., 2021). The B-isotope composition (δ11B) of coexisting tourmaline and white mica pairs are shown in Figure 2, along with the derived isotope exchange temperatures. Boron isotopic compositions of tourmaline in direct contact with
mica have median values of -9‰ (Fig. 2). There is no isotopic zoning but a slight variation with distance from the
ore veins. White mica has a more variable composition. The median δ11B values of mica from greisen and vein
selvages overlap (-17 to -18‰), whereas late-stage muscovite has lower values (down to -23‰). The B-isotope 22
composition of tourmaline-mica pairs from vein selvages provides an estimate for the temperature of vein formation
(450 ±50°C). The temperature estimate for a latemineralized fault zone is about 260°C (Fig. 2). The higher
temperatures agree well with Ti-in-quartz thermometry from wall-rock alteration zones (503 ± 24°C) and arsenopyrite geothermometry (438 ±44°C) from vein selvages (Fig. 2). The lower temperature of late mineralization overlaps with the range of fluid inclusion homogenization temperatures in vein quartz (360 to 230 °C).
In summary, the B-isotope data from both minerals are consistent with a magmatic source of fluids during the
stages of mineralization represented by mica and tourmaline samples, which supports the concept of multiple injections of magmatic-hydrothermal fluids (Codeço et al., 2017, 2019).