English
 
Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Conference Paper

Can glacial isostatic adjustment modelling confirm potential signs of glacially triggered faulting in Canada?

Authors

Steffen,  Holger
IUGG 2023, General Assemblies, 1 General, International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics (IUGG), External Organizations;

Steffen,  Rebekka
IUGG 2023, General Assemblies, 1 General, International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics (IUGG), External Organizations;

External Ressource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in GFZpublic
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Steffen, H., Steffen, R. (2023): Can glacial isostatic adjustment modelling confirm potential signs of glacially triggered faulting in Canada?, XXVIII General Assembly of the International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics (IUGG) (Berlin 2023).
https://doi.org/10.57757/IUGG23-1736


Cite as: https://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_5017854
Abstract
Glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA) leads to remarkable stress changes in the subsurface which can be potentially released along favourably orientated pre-existing fault structures, a process nowadays termed glacially triggered faulting. A notable vertical shift of some meters can occur. In coastal areas this can affect the measured elevation of relative sea level markers. In such case these markers must be corrected before they can be used in palaeo-sea level investigations.<br><br>Compared to Fennoscandia, the vast area of Canada does, so far, not contain any prominent traces of glacially triggered faulting which has led to interesting speculations in the literature. We will briefly review any suggested glacially induced faults in Canada and then analyze GIA-induced stress changes from a 3D finite element model of North America. We thereby test different stress regimes and (hypothetical) fault configurations to identify the most plausible fault parameters for reactivation. We will highlight the best parameter combinations for each fault or location of concern and compare them to available field observations. We will show that glacially triggered faulting has very likely affected most parts of Canada, including intraplate areas and Arctic islands. One example suggests that some relative sea level markers should be carefully used because faulting may have shifted the sample to a new elevation.