English
 
Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Conference Paper

Modelling of seismic anisotropy with rheologically constrained geodynamic setup

Authors
/persons/resource/poulami

Roy,  Poulami
2.5 Geodynamic Modelling, 2.0 Geophysics, Departments, GFZ Publication Database, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum;
IUGG 2023, General Assemblies, 1 General, International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics (IUGG), External Organizations;

/persons/resource/bstein

Steinberger,  B.
2.5 Geodynamic Modelling, 2.0 Geophysics, Departments, GFZ Publication Database, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum;
IUGG 2023, General Assemblies, 1 General, International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics (IUGG), External Organizations;

External Ressource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in GFZpublic
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Roy, P., Steinberger, B. (2023): Modelling of seismic anisotropy with rheologically constrained geodynamic setup, XXVIII General Assembly of the International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics (IUGG) (Berlin 2023).
https://doi.org/10.57757/IUGG23-4666


Cite as: https://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_5021075
Abstract
Seismic anisotropy is an observation that is believed to yield information on the flow pattern in the mantle. There are many studies of anisotropy in the upper mantle; however, the lower mantle is still underexplored, due to problems in seismic imaging and complexities of modelling of flow laws of different minerals. In this study, we modelled the radially anisotropic behavior of two different geodynamic setups, one is the rising of a mantle plume from the core-mantle boundary to the surface, and another is subduction of a slab reaching the lowermost mantle. We use ASPECT for modelling large scale mantle flow and ECOMAN to simulate the development of lattice preferred orientation of mantle fabric. We then couple the results from ASPECT to ECOMAN for modelling the radial anisotropy and maximum shear wave splitting direction. We show that in the part of the lowermost mantle surrounding the plume horizontally polarized shear waves (Vsh ) are faster than the vertically polarized ones (Vsv ) while the inside of the plume tail shows opposite signature. However, Vsh becomes greater than Vsv when the plume flattens out at the surface. We also find that the maximum splitting direction is horizontal outside the base of the plume and it becomes vertical inside the plume tail and again becomes horizontal at the surface. Moreover, our result for the slab setup reveals that as the slab reaches the lowermost mantle, Vsh becomes higher than Vsv and maximum splitting is horizontal at the base of the slab.