English
 
Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Conference Paper

Generative adversarial networks as a fast surrogate model for simulations

Authors

Mead,  Stuart
IUGG 2023, General Assemblies, 1 General, International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics (IUGG), External Organizations;

Hilton,  James
IUGG 2023, General Assemblies, 1 General, International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics (IUGG), External Organizations;

External Ressource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in GFZpublic
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Mead, S., Hilton, J. (2023): Generative adversarial networks as a fast surrogate model for simulations, XXVIII General Assembly of the International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics (IUGG) (Berlin 2023).
https://doi.org/10.57757/IUGG23-4913


Cite as: https://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_5021313
Abstract
The complexity and level of detail in numerical models for geosciences have increased as computational power has become more available and parallelism and new computational techniques have reduced the computational burden of numerical modelling. However simulations still pose a large computational challenge where a large number of simulations are required to adequately sample the input space. One approach to alleviating these limitations is through construction of a surrogate model. A surrogate (or metamodel) is a model of the simulation results within a defined parameter space. Surrogate models typically learn from simulation results to create a fast approximation to the numerical model. We have been using Generative Adversarial Networks (GAN’s) as a surrogate model to depth-averaged simulations of debris avalanches at Ruapehu volcano, New Zealand. This GAN appears highly successful, creating inundation outlines of volcanic debris avalanches (VDA) with high precision (>90% similarity to simulations in some cases) and more than 130,000 times faster than VDA simulations. Our trials of GANs so far highlight a few key points: (1) well-trained GAN surrogates have high accuracy in reproducing model footprints, (2) the surrogate GANs show better accuracy when constrained to groups with similar simulation inputs (i.e. it is not generalizable), and (3) different loss functions (mean-square error vs. mean absolute error) affect trainability and accuracy. These results, and our attempts to push the limits of GAN’s to problems that consider time-varying inputs, such as bushfire spread, will be highlighted.