English
 
Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Conference Paper

Simulation analysis of LEO constellation augmented GNSS (LeGNSS) zenith troposphere delay and gradients estimation

Authors

Ding,  Wenwu
IUGG 2023, General Assemblies, 1 General, International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics (IUGG), External Organizations;

Zhang,  Pengfei
IUGG 2023, General Assemblies, 1 General, International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics (IUGG), External Organizations;

Yuan,  Yunbin
IUGG 2023, General Assemblies, 1 General, International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics (IUGG), External Organizations;

Qu,  Xiaochuan
IUGG 2023, General Assemblies, 1 General, International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics (IUGG), External Organizations;

External Ressource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in GFZpublic
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Ding, W., Zhang, P., Yuan, Y., Qu, X. (2023): Simulation analysis of LEO constellation augmented GNSS (LeGNSS) zenith troposphere delay and gradients estimation, XXVIII General Assembly of the International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics (IUGG) (Berlin 2023).
https://doi.org/10.57757/IUGG23-4974


Cite as: https://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_5021373
Abstract
LEO satellites move faster and can greatly improve the observing geometry, thus are considered as an important supplement to current GNSS. There have been some studies on positioning performance and ionospheric modeling. However, detailed analysis results on troposphere estimation using LeGNSS observations are still relatively limited now. In this contribution, LEO constellation augmented GNSS (LeGNSS) troposphere estimation is investigated, and the impacts of relevant factors are analyzed in detail. When the temporal resolutions of zenith troposphere delay (ZTD) and horizontal gradients are 1 h and 2 h, while standard deviations (STDs) of phase and pseudorange observations at the zenith direction are 0.005 m and 0.5 m, the accuracies of ZTD, north gradient, and east gradient augmented by LEO constellation improve by 15.7%, 29.6%, and 16.4%, respectively, compared with GNSS solution. The results of troposphere estimation under obstructed environment and using low-cost dual frequency receivers also become more robust after adding LEO observations. Most importantly, analysis results during periods with rapid varying troposphere parameters suggest that the contribution of LEO constellation becomes even bigger with increasing temporal resolutions of ZTD and horizontal gradients, indicating that LeGNSS can be used to extract tropospheric parameters with improved accuracies at high temporal resolution. Thus, the capability in rapidly capturing severe weather events can be improved by LeGNSS observations, and the performance can become even better with increasing number of LEO satellites. All these results suggest that LeGNSS might be an important tool in improving the performance of troposphere estimation.