English
 
Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Conference Paper

Microseismic event and phase detection using deep learning and clustering methods

Authors

Li,  Lei
IUGG 2023, General Assemblies, 1 General, International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics (IUGG), External Organizations;

Peng,  Ling
IUGG 2023, General Assemblies, 1 General, International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics (IUGG), External Organizations;

Zeng,  Xiaobao
IUGG 2023, General Assemblies, 1 General, International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics (IUGG), External Organizations;

Shi,  Peidong
IUGG 2023, General Assemblies, 1 General, International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics (IUGG), External Organizations;

External Ressource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in GFZpublic
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Li, L., Peng, L., Zeng, X., Shi, P. (2023): Microseismic event and phase detection using deep learning and clustering methods, XXVIII General Assembly of the International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics (IUGG) (Berlin 2023).
https://doi.org/10.57757/IUGG23-4154


Cite as: https://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_5021593
Abstract
Microseismic monitoring is an important tool to characterize the reservoirs and delineate the growth of small-scale fractures. In addition, microseismic events are crucial for describing detailed fault geometries, stress changes, and spatial-temporal evolution of seismogenic activities. Deep learning has been extensively and successfully utilized for seismic event detection and phase picking. In this work, we propose an integrated workflow of waveform denoising, event detection, and seismic phase detection based on convolutional neural network (CNN) and unsupervised clustering, aiming at identifying and classifying microseismic P- and S-wave arrivals accurately. First, we preprocess (e.g., bandpass filter) the continuous waveforms and extract statistical features, and then feed the features into CNN for deep feature extraction and learning. The microseismic phase detection is then performed using clustering from waveform feature distance (similarity), which is retrieved from both statistical features of waveforms and the deep features extracted by CNN, yielding microseismic P- and S-wave arrival detections. We use synthetic data with different source mechanisms and signal-to-noise ratios, along with field microseismic data collected from the Hengill Geothermal area in Iceland, to verify the effectiveness of the proposed workflow in detecting weak microseismic phases. The refined phase detections also improved the resolution of stacking-based source imaging.