English
 
Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Stress Drop Variations of (A)Seismic Fault Segments in the Sea of Marmara Region (Northwestern Türkiye) Supported by Different Methodological Approaches

Authors
/persons/resource/xiang

Chen,  Xiang
2.6 Seismic Hazard and Risk Dynamics, 2.0 Geophysics, Departments, GFZ Publication Database, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum;

/persons/resource/kwiatek

Kwiatek,  Grzegorz
4.2 Geomechanics and Scientific Drilling, 4.0 Geosystems, Departments, GFZ Publication Database, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum;

/persons/resource/bindi

Bindi,  Dino
2.6 Seismic Hazard and Risk Dynamics, 2.0 Geophysics, Departments, GFZ Publication Database, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum;

/persons/resource/dbecker

Becker,  Dirk
4.2 Geomechanics and Scientific Drilling, 4.0 Geosystems, Departments, GFZ Publication Database, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum;

/persons/resource/bohnhoff

Bohnhoff,  M.
4.2 Geomechanics and Scientific Drilling, 4.0 Geosystems, Departments, GFZ Publication Database, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum;

/persons/resource/fcotton

Cotton,  Fabrice
2.6 Seismic Hazard and Risk Dynamics, 2.0 Geophysics, Departments, GFZ Publication Database, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum;

/persons/resource/patricia

Martinez Garzon,  P.
4.2 Geomechanics and Scientific Drilling, 4.0 Geosystems, Departments, GFZ Publication Database, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum;

External Ressource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in GFZpublic
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Chen, X., Kwiatek, G., Bindi, D., Becker, D., Bohnhoff, M., Cotton, F., Martinez Garzon, P. (2024 online): Stress Drop Variations of (A)Seismic Fault Segments in the Sea of Marmara Region (Northwestern Türkiye) Supported by Different Methodological Approaches. - Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.
https://doi.org/10.1785/0120240128


Cite as: https://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_5029353
Abstract
Earthquake source parameters provide key diagnostic observations to quantify the seismogenic environment and understand earthquake physics. Among them, earthquake stress drop plays an essential role in impacting the frequency content of ground motion. Accurate stress‐drop estimation is conditioned on data quality, appropriate modeling of propagation effects, and selection of the source model and inversion techniques. One way to evaluate reliability of stress‐drop assessments is to compare results combining different methodologies and assumptions. In this study, we calculate earthquake source parameters for micro‐ to moderate earthquakes in the Sea of Marmara region, northwestern Türkiye, where the Main Marmara fault encompasses a spectrum of slip behaviors from creeping to locked. We apply two approaches: (1) a spectral fitting approach to constrain the corner frequency, seismic moment, and quality factor, and (2) a nonparametric spectral decomposition approach to isolate source spectra from propagation and site effects. We then estimate the earthquake stress drop using a Brune source model. This leads to source parameter estimates for 1577 and 1549 earthquakes with (1.0–5.7) for the spectral fitting and spectral decomposition approaches, respectively. Despite the fundamental differences in methodologies, results from both methods are consistent, particularly in highlighting relative differences within the dataset. Small but statistically significant spatial stress‐drop variations are observed along different fault segments of the Main Marmara fault. In particular, lower average stress drops are observed in fault segments partially releasing slip aseismically, with the lowest values observed surrounding earthquake repeaters, which may imply a weaker fault in the creeping region. The M ≥ 5 earthquakes along the Main Marmara fault within the last decade were not followed by significant changes in the stress drop, suggesting no significant reduction of fault stress level or fault strength due to their occurrence, supporting the presumably high stress level on this fault.