English
 
Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Landslide mapping with deep learning: the role of pre-/post-event SAR features and multi-sensor data fusion

Authors

Orynbaikyzy,  Aiym
External Organizations;

Albrecht,  Frauke
External Organizations;

Yao,  Wei
External Organizations;

/persons/resource/motagh

Motagh,  M.
1.4 Remote Sensing, 1.0 Geodesy, Departments, GFZ Publication Database, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum;

/persons/resource/twang

Wang,  Tingting
4.1 Lithosphere Dynamics, 4.0 Geosystems, Departments, GFZ Publication Database, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum;

Martinis,  Sandro
External Organizations;

Plank,  Simon
External Organizations;

External Ressource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (public)

5035903.pdf
(Publisher version), 33MB

Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Orynbaikyzy, A., Albrecht, F., Yao, W., Motagh, M., Wang, T., Martinis, S., Plank, S. (2025): Landslide mapping with deep learning: the role of pre-/post-event SAR features and multi-sensor data fusion. - GIScience and Remote Sensing, 62, 1, 2502214.
https://doi.org/10.1080/15481603.2025.2502214


Cite as: https://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_5035903
Abstract
Landslide mapping is critically important for providing detailed spatial information on hazard extent ina timely manner that ultimately contributes to the protection of human lives and critical infrastructure.In the context of increasing demands for scalable and automated solutions, Earth Observation (EO) datacoupled with deep learning offer great potential to enhance the speed and accuracy of emergencymapping. This study explores the utility of a deep learning model with the U-Net architecture forautomated landslide mapping using data from optical Sentinel-2 and Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR)Sentinel-1 satellites. We investigate the effectiveness of various optical (visible, near-infrared, and short-wave infrared) and SAR-derived features (backscatter coefficients, polarimetric features, interferometriccoherence), used both independently and in combination. Additionally, we assess the impact ofincreasing the number of pre-/post-event SAR observations on classification performance. The U-Netmodels are trained and tested using globally distributed and limited reference data (563 uniquepatches). Optical features consisted of one pre-/post-event feature, whereas SAR features had threefor each reference sample. Our analysis shows that the highest classification accuracies are consistentlyachieved using optical features (F1-score of 0.83 with visible, near-, and short-wave infrared bands). Nosubstantial improvements were recorded when SAR features were combined with optical features. Theusage of the most common optical features (visible and near-infrared) shows the lowest accuraciescompared to their combination of short-wave infrared or red-edge bands. Increasing the number ofpre-/post-event SAR features improves the SAR-based accuracies. To promote further advancements inautomated landslide mapping using deep learning, the landslide reference dataset generated in thisstudy is freely available at (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15284357)