English
 
Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Conference Paper

Time-lapse offset and zero-offset VSP-data processing and imaging for monitoring CO2 injection

Authors
/persons/resource/jgoetz

Götz,  J.
CGS Centre for Geological Storage, Geoengineering Centres, GFZ Publication Database, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum;

/persons/resource/slueth

Lueth,  S.
CGS Centre for Geological Storage, Geoengineering Centres, GFZ Publication Database, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum;

Krawczyk,  C.M.
External Organizations;

Cosma,  C.
External Organizations;

External Ressource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in GFZpublic
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Götz, J., Lueth, S., Krawczyk, C., Cosma, C. (2013): Time-lapse offset and zero-offset VSP-data processing and imaging for monitoring CO2 injection, (Geophysical Research Abstracts Vol. 15, EGU2013-13661, 2013 ), General Assembly European Geosciences Union (Vienna, Austria 2013).


Cite as: https://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_331168
Abstract
As part of the seismic monitoring at the Ketzin CO2 storage site, time-lapse VSP data were acquired. The purpose of the VSP experiment was to complement 3D surface seismic data with higher spatial resolution in close vicinity to the injection well. More than 45 kt of CO2 were injected between the baseline and repeat VSP surveys. For each VSP survey, data were measured at one zero-offset and seven offset source locations around the injection site with offsets varying between 282 m and 907 m. The VSP was recorded in a vertical well using an 80 level 3C geophone string extending 325 – 720 m below ground level, with an interval of 5 m between the levels. The CO2 was injected into a saline sandstone reservoir in 630 – 650 m depth. The injection well has a distance of 112 m to the recording well. Processing and interpretation of the offset VSP data comprises the following steps: (1) Seismic elastic FD modelling based on well log data. (2) Time-lapse processing of the modelled and measured data (application of a shaping filter on the repeat data to match the traces of the baseline data, removal of downgoing waves by fk-filtering). (3) Imaging of the data with 2D Kirchhoff and 2D Fresnel migration. (4) Comparison of the VSP with 3D surface seismic data. Processing and interpretation of the zero-offset VSP comprises the following steps: (1) Seismic elastic FD modelling based on well log data and results of the band limited impedance inversion. (2) Processing of the modelled and measured data (removal of downgoing and enhancement of upgoing waves by median filtering, application of an outside corridor to account for propagation effects of upgoing waves, such as multiples). (3) Band limited impedance inversion of the measured, modelled and 3D surface seismic data. (4) Comparison of the VSP with 3D surface seismic data. The offset VSP is comparable to the 3D surface seismic for both imaging methods, the 2D Kirchhoff and the 2D Fresnel migration. The time-lapse data show the CO2 signature in the depth range of the reservoir for those imaging planes crossing the CO2 plume. The zero-offset VSP time-lapse data show strong amplitudes in the depth range of the reservoir caused by the injection of CO2. The time-lapse amplitude of the modelled data is weaker than that of the measured data. Seismic velocities derived from the impedances indicate a velocity reduction of 30 %. Thus, time-lapse VSP imaging at Ketzin shows that monitoring of small injection amounts is feasible.