Description of the multi-approach gravity field models from Swarm GPS data

Teixeira da Encarnação, J.; Visser, P.; Arnold, D.; Bezdek, A.; Doornbos, E.; Ellmer, M.; Guo, J.; van den IJssel, J.; Iorfida, E.; Jäggi, A.; Klokocník, J.; Krauss, S.; Mao, X.; Mayer-Gürr, T.; Meyer, U.; Sebera, J.; Shum, C. K.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, Y.; Dahle, C.

doi:10.5194/essd-12-1385-2020

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Add to Basket

Local TagsRelease HistoryDetailsSummary

Released

Journal Article

Description of the multi-approach gravity field models from Swarm GPS data

Authors

Teixeira da Encarnação, J.
External Organizations;

Visser, P.
External Organizations;

Arnold, D.
External Organizations;

Bezdek, A.
External Organizations;

Doornbos, E.
External Organizations;

Ellmer, M.
External Organizations;

Guo, J.
External Organizations;

van den IJssel, J.
External Organizations;

Iorfida, E.
External Organizations;

Jäggi, A.
External Organizations;

Klokocník, J.
External Organizations;

Krauss, S.
External Organizations;

Mao, X.
External Organizations;

Mayer-Gürr, T.
External Organizations;

Meyer, U.
External Organizations;

Sebera, J.
External Organizations;

Shum, C. K.
External Organizations;

Zhang, C.
External Organizations;

Zhang, Y.
External Organizations;

/persons/resource/dahle

Dahle, C.
1.2 Global Geomonitoring and Gravity Field, 1.0 Geodesy, Departments, GFZ Publication Database, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum;

External Ressource

No external resources are shared

Fulltext (public)

5002481.pdf
(Publisher version), 11MB

Supplementary Material (public)

There is no public supplementary material available

Citation

Teixeira da Encarnação, J., Visser, P., Arnold, D., Bezdek, A., Doornbos, E., Ellmer, M., Guo, J., van den IJssel, J., Iorfida, E., Jäggi, A., Klokocník, J., Krauss, S., Mao, X., Mayer-Gürr, T., Meyer, U., Sebera, J., Shum, C. K., Zhang, C., Zhang, Y., Dahle, C. (2020): Description of the multi-approach gravity field models from Swarm GPS data. - Earth System Science Data, 12, 1385-1417.
https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-1385-2020

Cite as: https://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_5002481

Abstract

Abstract Back to top Although the knowledge of the gravity of the Earth has improved considerably with CHAMP, GRACE, and GOCE (see appendices for a list of abbreviations) satellite missions, the geophysical community has identified the need for the continued monitoring of the time-variable component with the purpose of estimating the hydrological and glaciological yearly cycles and long-term trends. Currently, the GRACE-FO satellites are the sole dedicated provider of these data, while previously the GRACE mission fulfilled that role for 15 years. There is a data gap spanning from July 2017 to May 2018 between the end of the GRACE mission and start the of GRACE-FO, while the Swarm satellites have collected gravimetric data with their GPS receivers since December 2013. We present high-quality gravity field models (GFMs) from Swarm data that constitute an alternative and independent source of gravimetric data, which could help alleviate the consequences of the 10-month gap between GRACE and GRACE-FO, as well as the short gaps in the existing GRACE and GRACE-FO monthly time series. The geodetic community has realized that the combination of different gravity field solutions is superior to any individual model and set up the Combination Service of Time-variable Gravity Fields (COST-G) under the umbrella of the International Gravity Field Service (IGFS), part of the International Association of Geodesy (IAG). We exploit this fact and deliver the highest-quality monthly GFMs, resulting from the combination of four different gravity field estimation approaches. All solutions are unconstrained and estimated independently from month to month. We tested the added value of including kinematic baselines (KBs) in our estimation of GFMs and conclude that there is no significant improvement. The non-gravitational accelerations measured by the accelerometer on board Swarm C were also included in our processing to determine if this would improve the quality of the GFMs, but we observed that is only the case when the amplitude of the non-gravitational accelerations is higher than during the current quiet period in solar activity. Using GRACE data for comparison, we demonstrate that the geophysical signal in the Swarm GFMs is largely restricted to spherical harmonic degrees below 12. A 750 km smoothing radius is suitable to retrieve the temporal variations in Earth's gravity field over land areas since mid-2015 with roughly 4 cm equivalent water height (EWH) agreement with respect to GRACE. Over ocean areas, we illustrate that a more intense smoothing with 3000 km radius is necessary to resolve large-scale gravity variations, which agree with GRACE roughly at the level of 1 cm EWH, while at these spatial scales the GRACE observes variations with amplitudes between 0.3 and 1 cm EWH. The agreement with GRACE and GRACE-FO over nine selected large basins under analysis is 0.91 cm, 0.76 cm yr−1, and 0.79 in terms of temporal mean, trend, and correlation coefficient, respectively.