English
 
Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Scene invariants for quantifying radiative transfer uncertainty

Authors

Thompson,  David R.
External Organizations;

/persons/resource/nbohn

Bohn,  Niklas
1.4 Remote Sensing, 1.0 Geodesy, Departments, GFZ Publication Database, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum;

Braverman,  Amy
External Organizations;

Brodrick,  Philip G.
External Organizations;

Carmon,  Nimrod
External Organizations;

Eastwood,  Michael L.
External Organizations;

Fahlen,  Jay E.
External Organizations;

Green,  Robert O.
External Organizations;

Johnson,  Margaret C.
External Organizations;

Roberts,  Dar A.
External Organizations;

Susiluoto,  Jouni
External Organizations;

External Ressource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (public)

5006586.pdf
(Postprint), 4MB

Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Thompson, D. R., Bohn, N., Braverman, A., Brodrick, P. G., Carmon, N., Eastwood, M. L., Fahlen, J. E., Green, R. O., Johnson, M. C., Roberts, D. A., Susiluoto, J. (2021): Scene invariants for quantifying radiative transfer uncertainty. - Remote Sensing of Environment, 260, 112432.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2021.112432


Cite as: https://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_5006586
Abstract
Remote imaging spectroscopy, also known as hyperspectral imaging, uses Radiative Transfer Models (RTMs) to predict the measured radiance spectrum for a specific surface and atmospheric state. Discrepancies between RTM assumptions and physical reality can cause systematic errors in surface property estimates. We present a statistical method to quantify these model errors without invoking ground reference data. Our approach exploits scene invariants — properties of the environment which are stable over space or time — to estimate RTM discrepancies. We describe techniques for discovering these features opportunistically in flight data. We then demonstrate data-driven methods that estimate the aggregate errors due to model discrepancies without having to explicitly identify the underlying physical mechanisms. The resulting distributions can improve posterior uncertainty predictions in operational retrievals.