Deutsch
 
Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT

Freigegeben

Konferenzbeitrag

Bulk snow density vs snow density profiles at Weissfluhjoch

Urheber*innen

Fierz,  Charles
IUGG 2023, General Assemblies, 1 General, International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics (IUGG), External Organizations;

Marty,  Christoph
IUGG 2023, General Assemblies, 1 General, International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics (IUGG), External Organizations;

Externe Ressourcen
Es sind keine externen Ressourcen hinterlegt
Volltexte (frei zugänglich)
Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Volltexte in GFZpublic verfügbar
Ergänzendes Material (frei zugänglich)
Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Ergänzenden Materialien verfügbar
Zitation

Fierz, C., Marty, C. (2023): Bulk snow density vs snow density profiles at Weissfluhjoch, XXVIII General Assembly of the International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics (IUGG) (Berlin 2023).
https://doi.org/10.57757/IUGG23-3855


Zitierlink: https://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_5020690
Zusammenfassung
There exist quite a few studies comparing measurements of snow density taken with different snow samplers. On the other hand, there are less comparisons between measurements of bulk snow density, that is the density of the full snowpack, and layer based, continuous snow density profiles recorded concurrently at the same site. On the study plot Weissfluhjoch, located at 2536 m asl above Davos, bulk snow density is measured since the winter 1937. Starting in the late eighties, however, about one fifth of these measurements are accompanied by parallel measurements of snow density profiles with snow samplers such as density cutters of various shapes, half-liter cylinders, the electronic Denoth device, or the SnowMicroPen. Sometimes even more than one parallel measurement is available.In this contribution we will present the full data set and conduct a thorough comparison of (a) bulk snow density measurements vs layer based, continuous snow density profiles to assess the difference statistics between them and (b) intercompare snow density profiles to unveil advantages and disadvantages of both different samplers and different sampling methods.